Average Bench: 107% (13th of 593)

Based on 1,532 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F 56 Models: Radeon RX Vega, Radeon(TM) RX Vega

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]


Outstanding average bench

The AMD RX Vega 56 averaged 7.0% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega 56 near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 280fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 299fps

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega 56 is 47.5%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega 56 performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 224fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 179fps

Average Bench

(Based on 1,532 samples)
Min Avg Max
192 Lighting 280 333
190 Reflection 224 238
196 Parallax 462 561
107% 322 fps
Min Avg Max
164 MRender 179 187
198 Gravity 299 346
200 Splatting 280 297
107% 253 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Lighting 308
Reflection 234
Parallax 513
118% 352 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 307
Splatting 292
110% 260 fps
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Lighting 308
Reflection 233
Parallax 474
114% 338 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 307
Splatting 291
110% 260 fps
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Lighting 277
Reflection 229
Parallax 426
102% 311 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 276
Splatting 282
103% 246 fps
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Lighting 274
Reflection 220
Parallax 411
100% 302 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 272
Splatting 268
100% 237 fps
1,532 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 10,288,704 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 1,532 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $400 @ launch in Aug '17)
AMD(1002 0B36) 17% 105% ± 9%
AMD(1002 6B76) 15% 103% ± 11%
Sapphire RX Vega 56 8GB
XFX RX Vega 56 8GB
EbayUS $80830 mins
Gigabyte RX Vega 56 8GB
Asus(1043 0555) 15% 111% ± 14%
Device(1DA2 E376) 14% 107% ± 13%
PowerColor(148C 2388) 12% 107% ± 15%
MSI(1462 3681) 10% 106% ± 11%
MSI RX Vega 56 8GB Gaming Air Boost
RX Vega 56 Air Boost 8G OC
EbayUS $48527 mins
AmazonUS $51025 mins
Device(1DA2 E37F) 8% 114% ± 9%
Gigabyte(1458 230C) 6% 110% ± 12%
Gigabyte RX Vega 56 8GB OC
AmazonUS $49025 mins
EbayUS $50027 mins
NeweggUS $50512 days
XFX(1682 9C30) 2% 95% ± 19%
ASRock(1849 1001) 0% 104% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega 56 Builds (Compare 13,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 76%
Workstation 72%

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $117

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,002

Popular RX Vega 56 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added 10 months ago.


7 months ago.

Free sync monitor from AGON (gaming 144hz


25 days ago.

sick gpu, gonna bench when i got the max clock with a v64 bios and custom cooling..


16 days ago.

Vulkan, Direct3D12 are better supports


7 days ago.

better than the 1070, if only the vega 64 was like the 56


2 months ago.

good gpu for its price and is as just good as any 1070 gtx which has atleast $100 more in price


1 month ago.

I have this graphic card.. And i can't complain about it. Just love it 3


2 months ago.

yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!! FCK TITAN KILLER!!! AGAIN! R9 290X first TITAN Z KILLER,FURY X THEN DESTROY TITAN XP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


10 months ago.


18 days ago.

Undervolt and get the best out of it!


9 months ago.

Full disclosure, my Vega 64 is a Vega 56 running the Vega 64 BIOS. After flashing I feel as though I got a much better GPU than AMD intended. With the voltage bump on the HBM2 I can stay super stable at 1020mhz and with some substantial undervolting my Vega 56 performs above Vega 64 stock speeds and trades blows with the GTX 1080 in some games. The reference design is very robust overclocks nicely (albeit loudly). A desperately needed entry in AMDs line-up for those of us with Freesync monitors.

Reaching its prime
Age: 12 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia GTX 1070
vs Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
vs AMD RX 480
vs Nvidia GTX 1080
vs Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 970
vs AMD RX 580
vs Nvidia GTX 980 Ti
vs AMD R9 390

593 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $333Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback