Average Bench: 86.6% (82nd of 714)

Based on 91,676 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F Models: Radeon(TM) RX Vega, Radeon RX Vega

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

Very good average bench

The AMD RX Vega-64 averaged just 13.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega-64 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 111fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 132fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega-64 is just 17.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega-64 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 108fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 178fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 91,676 samples)
Min Avg Max
95.4 Lighting 111 122
98.4 Reflection 108 114
151 Parallax 178 197
90.1% 132 fps
Min Avg Max
86.6 MRender 92.3 95.4
114 Gravity 132 143
73 Splatting 75.8 78.4
79.8% 100 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
PowerColor(148C 2387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Lighting 113
Reflection 111
Parallax 194
92% 139 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 136
Splatting 77.3
82% 103 fps
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Lighting 112
Reflection 110
Parallax 173
91% 132 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 132
Splatting 77.1
81% 101 fps
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Lighting 105
Reflection 107
Parallax 166
85% 126 fps
MRender 88.8
Gravity 126
Splatting 76.6
78% 97 fps
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Lighting 101
Reflection 110
Parallax 169
83% 127 fps
MRender 91.9
Gravity 116
Splatting 77
76% 95.1 fps
91,676 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,459,629 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 91,676 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $600 @ launch in Aug '17)
Asus(1043 04C4) 29% 84% ± 3%
Asus RX Vega 64 8GB ROG Strix Gaming
ROG-STRIX-RXVEGA64-O8G-GAMING
AmazonUS $5008 months
AMD(1002 6B76) 20% 86% ± 5%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB
GV-RXVEGA64-8GD-B
AmazonUS $4003 years
XFX RX Vega 64 8GB
RX-VEGMTBFX6
EbayUS $7442 months
Sapphire RX Vega 64 8GB
21275-02-20G
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) 18% 90% ± 5%
AMD(1002 0B36) 14% 87% ± 6%
Gigabyte(1458 2308) 9% 86% ± 5%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB Gaming OC
GV-RXVEGA64GAMING OC-8GD
AmazonUS $6793 years
MSI(1462 3680) 6% 88% ± 4%
MSI RX Vega 64 8GB Gaming Air Boost
RX VEGA 64 AIR BOOST 8G OC
AmazonUS $8793 years
PowerColor(148C 2387) 2% 87% ± 5%
XFX(1682 9C10) 1% 83% ± 7%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega-64 Builds (Compare 23,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $754

Popular RX Vega-64 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 6 years ago.

Liked

23 days ago.

Comment 

vs. 1080: Worse performance, FAR higher power consumption, FAR higher thermal output, more expensive - literally no upside unless you have spent alot on a top-notch freesync monitor and can get the 64 at the same price as a 1080.—Oct '17


Good

4 months ago.

Mayor desempeño y poco calentamiento


Excellent

17 months ago.

Great Overclocker, The HBM is great for productive aplications. Its a bit of a spaceheater, great for cold winter nights.


Excellent

3 years ago.

Sure may be power hungry, hot and noisy, but for the price I paid (under USD 250) it's great value for money


Excellent

15 months ago.

Comment 

AMD's try to rival the Titan series, and get into the "heavy workload" market. Powerhungry, extremely expensive, buggy drivers were the major problems why creators, editors wont buy this GPU. Not for gaming! Although, if you want to risk it, it may pay off. My adivce? Get a Titan for your cash, and dont let AMD's BS fool you.—Mar '21


Good

5 months ago.

In games with new API (dx12, vulkan) it have better performance, than nVidia cads, that cost the same.


Good

3 years ago.

Finally, AMD have a good competitor to high end NVIDIA GPUs


Excellent

4 years ago.

With better texture. Mos def, I am going for it this year


Excellent

2 years ago.

this vote is for the sapphire nitro+ edition, too good


Good

2 months ago.

I think thatz because its so old that you should use the avarage used price not new price


Good

6 months ago.

STRONGER THAN 1080 BUT HERE IS BELOW THAN 1070 :)))) ONLY SITE ON WORLD WITH SO POOR BENCHMARK


Good

2 years ago.

worth is its around 200 dollars cheaper than a 1080 and the performance is quite similar


Good

4 years ago.

Cheaper now out performs in some games


Good

4 years ago.


Excellent

5 years ago.

If you're going to buy a Vega 64, do yourself a favor and buy a Sapphire Nitro+, PowerColor Red Devil, or Asus ROG Strix. As far as I can tell, those are just about the only three cards worth buying if you want some of the best performance Vega 64 has to offer. I have the Sapphire Nitro+ card and I would argue that it's the best Vega 64 on the market. I've run countless benchmarks with mine (not just here on UserBenchmark) and the results are almost consistently ahead of the GTX 1080/RTX 2070/Vega 64 Liquid pack and often approach the performance of the GTX 1080 Ti/RTX 2080/Radeon VII. If you buy a reference (blower style) card, you're probably not going to see results like those I mentioned above. At least, not without maxing the fan speed (creating a lot of noise) or installing a custom cooler or watercooling solution. The same can be said of most any reference card, whether AMD or Nvidia. At the prices these have been selling for recently (sub-$400 or even the $420 Sapphire Nitro+), they still offer great cost-to-performance, even when compared to Nvidia's recent competitive GPUs. It just depends what you're looking for, what you need, or who you pledge allegiance to (and there are a lot of you that only see green because the propaganda-filled marketing machine is unstoppable).


Terrible

4 years ago.

Uses too much power - even more than a 2080 Ti!


Excellent

4 years ago.

3333


Excellent

11 months ago.

It is exacltly like a GTX 1080 ... So I prefer to both on them the GTX 1080 ti at more or less the same price-


Excellent

4 years ago.

At first I was underwhelmed but the price was right. $250.00 cheaper than the 2070 was going to buy initially . After some over clocking, undervolting and bechmarking here and the valley I got it to runquite well. Way better than most. The numbers speak for themselves.


Terrible

6 years ago.

Overpriced, cost as much as a 1080Ti ($699), uses too much power and poor performance for the money. Poor Vega.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Seriously powerful card stock. Underclock/overclock and you have a beast.


Terrible

5 years ago.

trash card


Poor

3 years ago.

poor price/performance the only good thing in it is that deliver 10bit in OpenCL. yet it still terrible in OpenGL and DirectX.


Excellent

6 years ago.

can some one help me overclock this card for mining my email is jsarrio@tulane.edu thanks


Excellent

6 years ago.

I was lucky to have bought it at 570€. I bought it because I hate nvidia's gimping (gameworks) and the extremely slow OpenCL performances on macOS (I sometimes use it on an Hackintosh). Best card I've ever tried! I use it in 1080p or 1400p virtual, and every game can be played at 60fps without any problem. At those resolutions it uses about 150-180W, and I'm happy with that.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Got it for 400 dollars and have been able to Undervolt and Overclock for a significant performance boost over stock. Love this card and I believe it is a great alternative for a 1080 and 2070 if you can find it for the right price.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Super solid card. No issues!


Excellent

4 years ago.

Vega 64 in crossfire will as of today (25/05/2019), out-bench and out-fps in 60% of games compared to a single 2080ti for 400$ cheaper, at the expense of power consumption and heat.


Excellent

4 years ago.

ich habe eine vega 64 nitro+ wirklich ein super gerät, entlich alles in 4k zocken


Good

4 years ago.

With a morpheus cooler and the right tweaking OOF Until it blows up on you


Excellent

4 years ago.

nice card ;) good performances in game and 3d work ;) overclocking capacity takes time but with good power we get very good performance well above the reference version and even compared to all versions custome (air or liquid).


Excellent

4 years ago.

undervolting works mint!


Excellent

3 years ago.

After playing around with voltages and clock speeds, on both the core clock and memory, I was able to achieve 110%. Loud card, will definitely change the cooler in the future.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback