Average Bench: 114% (6th of 544)

Based on 483 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F Models: Radeon(TM) RX Vega, Radeon RX Vega

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Outstanding average bench

The AMD RX Vega 64 averaged 14.0% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega 64 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 300fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 331fps

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega 64 is 60.9%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega 64 performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 229fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 182fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 483 samples)
Min Avg Max
192 Lighting 300 373
192 Reflection 229 254
198 Parallax 493 621
114% 341 fps
Min Avg Max
168 MRender 182 199
198 Gravity 331 400
194 Splatting 286 321
114% 267 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
AMD(1002 6B76) ≥ 4GB; S1275-02-20G
CLim: 1707 MHz, MLim: 1085 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Lighting 347
Reflection 245
Parallax 524
127% 372 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 341
Splatting 306
119% 280 fps
AMD(1002 6B76) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Lighting 283
Reflection 232
Parallax 565
119% 360 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 351
Splatting 297
118% 277 fps
AMD(1002 6B76) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Lighting 263
Reflection 237
Parallax 556
114% 352 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 346
Splatting 296
118% 276 fps
483 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 5,025,619 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 483 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
AMD(1002 6B76) 100% 114% ± 16%
AMD(1002 0B36) 0% 106% ± 5%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega 64 Builds (Compare 4,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $235

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,496

Popular RX Vega 64 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

 Comments

Added 1 month ago.

Terrible

1 hr ago.

Fuck you AMD and AMD fanboys fuck you!!!!!


Excellent

2 days ago.

The cheapest RX 64 I could find was $689 on Newegg.com


Excellent

13 hrs ago.

AMD ISINIYOR AMK


Excellent

16 days ago.

RADEON


Poor

9 days ago.

I hate miners so much. This gpu should cost no more than 500 euro but it costs 800. I hate miners so much.


Excellent

12 days ago.

vs. 1080: Worse performance, FAR higher power consumption, FAR higher thermal output, more expensive - literally no upside unless you have spent alot on a top-notch freesync monitor and can get the 64 at the same price as a 1080.


Good

17 days ago.


Excellent

1 month ago.

3


Terrible

14 days ago.

Overpriced, cost as much as a 1080Ti ($699), uses too much power and poor performance for the money. Poor Vega.


Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 13 pages, please contribute.


544 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $325Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $119
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $152SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $57HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback