Average Bench: 117% (11th of 595)

Based on 5,118 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F Models: Radeon(TM) RX Vega, Radeon RX Vega

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Outstanding average bench

The AMD RX Vega 64 averaged 17.2% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega 64 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 346fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 300fps

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega 64 is 58.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega 64 performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 228fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 185fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,118 samples)
Min Avg Max
178 Lighting 300 363
194 Reflection 228 243
199 Parallax 525 616
118% 351 fps
Min Avg Max
173 MRender 185 194
200 Gravity 346 394
199 Splatting 289 306
117% 274 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Device(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1752 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Lighting 347
Reflection 241
Parallax 624
138% 404 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 413
Splatting 317
133% 309 fps
CLim: 1632 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Lighting 364
Reflection 241
Parallax 597
139% 401 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 400
Splatting 298
128% 296 fps
CLim: 1679 MHz, MLim: 1132 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Lighting 347
Reflection 246
Parallax 612
137% 402 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 364
Splatting 308
124% 289 fps
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Lighting 342
Reflection 235
Parallax 585
133% 387 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 396
Splatting 294
126% 292 fps
CLim: 1662 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Lighting 333
Reflection 241
Parallax 583
131% 386 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 347
Splatting 301
119% 279 fps
5,118 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 10,967,033 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 5,118 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $600 @ launch in Aug '17)
AMD(1002 6B76) 29% 116% ± 15%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB
GV-RXVEGA64-8GD-B
EbayUS $79917 mins
AmazonUS $8495 months
XFX RX Vega 64 8GB
RX-VEGMTBFX6
Sapphire RX Vega 64 8GB
21275-02-20G
Asus(1043 04C4) 28% 116% ± 13%
Asus RX Vega 64 8GB ROG Strix Gaming
ROG-STRIX-RXVEGA64-O8G-GAMING
AmazonUS $6508 mins
EbayUS $77012 mins
Device(1DA2 E37F) 18% 121% ± 16%
Gigabyte(1458 2308) 10% 115% ± 18%
Gigabyte RX Vega 64 8GB Gaming OC
GV-RXVEGA64GAMING OC-8GD
AmazonUS $5008 mins
NeweggUS $50011 hrs
EbayUS $57912 mins
PowerColor(148C 2387) 10% 118% ± 13%
AMD(1002 0B36) 2% 122% ± 9%
MSI(1462 3680) 2% 113% ± 19%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega 64 Builds (Compare 10,542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,169

Popular RX Vega 64 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 13 months ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

1 hr ago.

The Vega 64 is a very good card,but the gtx 1080 cost around the same and its way better,if the price wasnt so high it would be good,its around 1070 level at best


Good

2 days ago.

I like but it is a little to expensive. In comparison a Nvidia graphics card with the same price is a bit faster. But with vega you can use Free-Sync so you can save some monex there.


Excellent

5 days ago.

ЛОЖЬ! наглая ЛОЖЬ! 1080 начинается от 50 000 руб в ценах!


Excellent

3 days ago.

excellent


Good

2 months ago.

I hate miners so much. This gpu should cost no more than 500 euro but it costs 800. I hate miners so much.


Excellent

1 month ago.

Comment 

vs. 1080: Worse performance, FAR higher power consumption, FAR higher thermal output, more expensive - literally no upside unless you have spent alot on a top-notch freesync monitor and can get the 64 at the same price as a 1080.—Oct '17


Excellent

3 days ago.

Mayor desempeño y poco calentamiento


Poor

23 days ago.

I like it but the card is not optimated for games thats bother me but i will buy this one, but the custom deisgn


Excellent

3 months ago.

STRONGER THAN 1080 BUT HERE IS BELOW THAN 1070 :)))) ONLY SITE ON WORLD WITH SO POOR BENCHMARK


Good

12 months ago.


Poor

12 months ago.

Way too expensive. Please, buy a 1080 instead.


Terrible

12 months ago.

Overpriced, cost as much as a 1080Ti ($699), uses too much power and poor performance for the money. Poor Vega.


Excellent

11 months ago.

can some one help me overclock this card for mining my email is jsarrio@tulane.edu thanks


Excellent

7 months ago.

I was lucky to have bought it at 570€. I bought it because I hate nvidia's gimping (gameworks) and the extremely slow OpenCL performances on macOS (I sometimes use it on an Hackintosh). Best card I've ever tried! I use it in 1080p or 1400p virtual, and every game can be played at 60fps without any problem. At those resolutions it uses about 150-180W, and I'm happy with that.


Your
opinion?
Reaching its prime
Age: 13 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia GTX 1070
vs Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
vs AMD RX 480
vs Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1080
vs Nvidia GTX 970
vs AMD RX 580
vs Nvidia GTX 980 Ti
vs AMD R9 390

595 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $320Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $115
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $139SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback