Real World Speed
Performance profile from 56,486 user samples
28,446 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 39% Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB
Worst Bench: 33% Sapphire(174B E271)
Poor: 33% Great: 39%
SPEED RANK: 58th / 549
28,040 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 41% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 41% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
36.3 % -23% 44.6 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
146 fps -18% 173 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
62.6 fps -66% 104 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+66%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
94.8 fps -24% 118 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+24%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
89.2 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+6%
84 fps -6%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
162 fps -20% 194 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.2 fps -58% 108 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+58%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
102 fps -22% 124 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+22%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
97.3 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
90.3 fps -8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
108 fps -29% 140 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+29%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.9 fps -26% 74.4 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+26%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
41.3 fps -5% 43.3 fps +5%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
42.6 fps -4% 44.3 fps +4%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.8 fps -29% 64 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+29%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
31.1 fps -37% 42.6 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+37%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.2 fps -10% 73 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+10%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps -29% 155 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+29%
Market Share
Based on 6,196,340 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.53 % Slightly higher market share.
+13%
0.47 % -13%
Value
Value For Money
54.6 % -12% 61.1 % Slightly better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
86 % -7% 92 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
Price
Price (score)
$199 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
$228 -13%
Age
Newest
50 Months -40% 30 Months Much more recent.
+40%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
122 fps -16% 142 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
95.5 fps -43% 137 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+43%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
112 fps -18% 132 fps Better lighting effects.
+18%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
87.4 fps -48% 129 fps Much better reflection handling.
+48%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $308Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $37
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback