Real World Speed
Performance profile from 82,380 user samples
34,097 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
Worst Bench: 34% MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
Poor: 34% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 43rd / 546
48,283 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 74% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 74% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 546
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
45.8 % -115% 98.6 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+115%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
191 fps -70% 325 fps Much better texture detail.
+70%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.9 fps -202% 193 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+202%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
141 fps -104% 288 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+104%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
91.5 fps -115% 197 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+115%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
223 fps -71% 381 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+71%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
71.5 fps -201% 215 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+201%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
160 fps -105% 328 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+105%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
104 fps -119% 228 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+119%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
144 fps -76% 254 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+76%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72.7 fps -65% 120 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+65%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
39.2 fps -126% 88.8 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+126%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
47.9 fps -103% 97.1 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+103%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
42.9 fps -118% 93.4 fps Hugely Better Fallout 4 fps.
+118%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps -232% 143 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+232%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
105 fps -43% 150 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+43%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
40.1 fps -117% 87.1 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+117%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
143 fps -113% 305 fps Hugely Better League of Legends fps.
+113%
Market Share
Based on 5,357,168 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.71 % -51% 1.07 % Much higher market share.
+51%
Value
Value For Money
66.4 % -12% 74.4 % Slightly better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
78 % -37% 107 % Much more popular.
+37%
Price
Price (score)
$210 Much cheaper.
+63%
$560 -63%
Age
Newest
48 Months -40% 29 Months Much more recent.
+40%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
164 fps -132% 381 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+132%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
94.3 fps -241% 322 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+241%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
141 fps -127% 320 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+127%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
82.3 fps -245% 284 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+245%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $319Nvidia GTX 1070 $395Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $222Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $153
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $785SanDisk Extreme 32GB $18
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback