Real World Speed
Performance profile from 24,017 user samples
10,254 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 56% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 543
13,763 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 46% MSI(1462 3414)
Poor: 46% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 543
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
70.5 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
57.9 % -22%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
269 fps Better texture detail.
+23%
218 fps -23%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
123 fps -5% 129 fps +5%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
173 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+15%
150 fps -15%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
173 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+45%
119 fps -45%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
305 fps Better peak texture detail.
+16%
262 fps -16%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
132 fps -5% 139 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+5%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
188 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+6%
177 fps -6%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
187 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+47%
127 fps -47%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
90.6 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+7%
84.8 fps -7%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.7 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+18%
47.2 fps -18%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.7 fps +2% 57.8 fps -2%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80.3 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+12%
71.4 fps -12%
Market Share
Based on 4,352,374 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % -60% 0.4 % Much higher market share.
+60%
Value
Value For Money
53.9 % -57% 84.5 % Much better value.
+57%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % -19% 92 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score)
$549 -62% $208 Much cheaper.
+62%
Age
Newest
45 Months -76% 11 Months Much more recent.
+76%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
223 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
192 fps -16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
166 fps -6% 176 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+6%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
200 fps Better lighting effects.
+29%
155 fps -29%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
153 fps -5% 161 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+5%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $410Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $128SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback