Real World Speed
Performance profile from 88,905 user samples
15,283 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 57% Sapphire(174B E285)
Poor: 57% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 592
73,622 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% EVGA(3842 4992)
Worst Bench: 56% MSI(1462 3233)
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
67.8 % 96.4 % Much faster effective speed.
+42%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
272 fps 318 fps Better texture detail.
+17%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
124 fps 190 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+53%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
174 fps 280 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+61%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
174 fps 194 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+11%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
306 fps 383 fps Better peak texture detail.
+25%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
132 fps 217 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+64%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
187 fps 325 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+74%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
185 fps 224 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+21%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
142 fps 249 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+76%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.2 fps 122 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+38%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.3 fps 83.2 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+69%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60.1 fps 97.3 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+62%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.4 fps 134 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+51%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46.7 fps 85.2 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+83%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
108 fps 116 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+7%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
180 fps 243 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+35%
Market Share
Based on 9,271,562 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.17 % 0.85 % Hugely higher market share.
+400%
Value
Value For Money
51.8 % 73.6 % Much better value.
+42%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
83 % 105 % More popular.
+27%
Price
Price (score)
$549 +0% $550
Age
Newest
56 Months 37 Months Much more recent.
+34%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
222 fps 371 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+67%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
164 fps 327 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+99%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
201 fps 312 fps Much better lighting effects.
+55%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
154 fps 278 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+81%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $138
Intel Core i5-8600K $222AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback