Real World Speed
Performance profile from 47,116 user samples
22,573 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 40% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 40% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 43rd / 544
24,543 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 39% Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB
Worst Bench: 32% PwrHis(1787 201C) 2GB
Poor: 32% Great: 39%
SPEED RANK: 56th / 544
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
44.4 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
36 % -23%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
171 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
145 fps -18%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
103 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+66%
62.2 fps -66%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
118 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
93.7 fps -26%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
85.1 fps -4% 88.3 fps +4%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
193 fps Better peak texture detail.
+18%
163 fps -18%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
109 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+61%
67.9 fps -61%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
125 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+23%
102 fps -23%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
91.3 fps -6% 96.8 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
141 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+23%
115 fps -23%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.5 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+25%
60.5 fps -25%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
45.2 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+15%
39.3 fps -15%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
47.4 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+8%
43.8 fps -8%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
63.6 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+23%
51.6 fps -23%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
179 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+36%
132 fps -36%
Market Share
Based on 4,630,799 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.5 % -26% 0.63 % Higher market share.
+26%
Value
Value For Money
64.3 % Better value.
+19%
54.1 % -19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
92 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
84 % -10%
Price
Price (score)
$210 -5% $199 Slightly cheaper.
+5%
Age
Newest
26 Months Much more recent.
+43%
46 Months -43%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
142 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+15%
123 fps -15%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
139 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+46%
95.4 fps -46%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
131 fps Better lighting effects.
+18%
111 fps -18%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps Much better reflection handling.
+49%
86.8 fps -49%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $307Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $99
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $291AMD RX 480 $390Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $130
Intel Core i5-7600K $217Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $155
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback