Real World Speed
Performance profile from 34,521 user samples
16,121 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 51% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 39% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 39% Great: 51%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 535
18,400 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 04ED) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 62% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 535
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
47.1 % -47% 69.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+47%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
172 fps -49% 256 fps Much better texture detail.
+49%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
104 fps -22% 127 fps Faster multi rendering.
+22%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
119 fps -38% 164 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
88.2 fps -102% 178 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+102%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
195 fps -48% 288 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+48%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
111 fps -23% 137 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+23%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps -38% 178 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+38%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
95.7 fps -103% 194 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+103%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps -55% 190 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+55%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56.2 fps -13% 63.2 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+13%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
183 fps -15% 211 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+15%
Market Share
Based on 3,219,415 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.6 % -17% 0.7 % Higher market share.
+17%
Value
Value For Money
72.1 % -9% 78.3 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
84 % -7% 90 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
Price
Price (score)
$194 Much cheaper.
+36%
$304 -36%
Age
Newest
21 Months 0% 21 Months 0%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps -53% 219 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+53%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
143 fps -20% 172 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+20%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
132 fps -50% 198 fps Much better lighting effects.
+50%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps -22% 158 fps Better reflection handling.
+22%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $310Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
Intel Core i5-7600K $215AMD RX 480 $205Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $328Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $178
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $113SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $430SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback