Real World Speed
Performance profile from 66,459 user samples
32,987 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 39% XFX(1682 9380)
Poor: 39% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 59th / 590
33,472 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% XFX(1682 9390)
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 58% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 37th / 590
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
44.4 % 66 % Much faster effective speed.
+49%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
172 fps 255 fps Much better texture detail.
+48%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
104 fps 126 fps Faster multi rendering.
+21%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
118 fps 163 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
83.4 fps 177 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+112%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps 284 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+46%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
109 fps 134 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+23%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
126 fps 172 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+37%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
89.9 fps 187 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+108%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
139 fps 184 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+32%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73 fps 99.8 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+37%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
41.1 fps 45.9 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+12%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50.8 fps 70.1 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+38%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43.5 fps 65.9 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+52%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
64.1 fps 101 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+58%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
86 fps 115 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+33%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
41.6 fps 51.9 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+25%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
71.6 fps 101 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+41%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
138 fps 180 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+31%
Market Share
Based on 8,868,706 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.37 % Slightly higher market share.
+6%
0.35 %
Value
Value For Money
60.9 % 74.7 % Better value.
+23%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
93 % 97 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$228 Cheaper.
+25%
$304
Age
Newest
35 Months 35 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps 214 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+50%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
139 fps 166 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+19%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
131 fps 198 fps Much better lighting effects.
+51%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps 156 fps Better reflection handling.
+21%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $292Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i5-8600K $239AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback