Real World Speed
Performance profile from 149,808 user samples
16,121 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 51% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 39% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 39% Great: 51%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 535
133,687 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% EVGA(3842 3975)
Worst Bench: 55% Gigabyte(1458 367A)
Poor: 55% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 535
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
47.1 % -36% 64.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
172 fps -14% 196 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+14%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
104 fps -45% 151 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+45%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
119 fps -56% 186 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+56%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
88.2 fps -44% 127 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+44%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
195 fps -15% 225 fps Better peak texture detail.
+15%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
111 fps -54% 171 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+54%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps -63% 210 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+63%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
95.7 fps -49% 143 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+49%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps -28% 157 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+28%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56.2 fps -14% 64 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+14%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
183 fps -29% 237 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+29%
Market Share
Based on 3,219,415 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.6 % -667% 4.6 % Hugely higher market share.
+667%
Value
Value For Money
72.1 % -8% 77.7 % Slightly better value.
+8%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
84 % -12% 94 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
Price
Price (score)
$194 Cheaper.
+29%
$275 -29%
Age
Newest
21 Months Much more recent.
+30%
30 Months -30%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps -66% 237 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+66%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
143 fps -41% 201 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+41%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
132 fps -53% 202 fps Much better lighting effects.
+53%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
129 fps -36% 176 fps Much better reflection handling.
+36%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $310Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
Intel Core i5-7600K $215AMD RX 480 $205Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $328Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $178
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $113SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $430SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback