Real World Speed
Performance profile from 59,966 user samples
18,461 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 51% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 42% PwrHis(1787 200F) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 42% Great: 51%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 542
41,505 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3230) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 79% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 5th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
47.4 % -115% 102 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+115%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
173 fps -90% 329 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+90%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
104 fps -89% 197 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+89%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
119 fps -148% 295 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+148%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
88 fps -130% 202 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+130%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
194 fps -96% 381 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+96%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
110 fps -98% 218 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+98%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
128 fps -159% 332 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+159%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
94.6 fps -141% 228 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+141%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps -64% 200 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+64%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56.2 fps -77% 99.4 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+77%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
183 fps -59% 292 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+59%
Market Share
Based on 3,783,607 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.54 % -135% 1.27 % Hugely higher market share.
+135%
Value
Value For Money
72.5 % -6% 77 % Slightly better value.
+6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
87 % -9% 95 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$194 Much cheaper.
+65%
$560 -65%
Age
Newest
23 Months +4% 24 Months -4%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps -193% 419 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+193%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
141 fps -132% 327 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+132%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
133 fps -149% 331 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+149%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
130 fps -123% 290 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+123%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $99
Intel Core i5-7600K $225AMD RX 480 $248Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $132
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback