Real World Speed
Performance profile from 41,321 user samples
21,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 74% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 57% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 57% Great: 74%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 542
19,813 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 51% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 40% Asus(1043 04E3)
Poor: 40% Great: 51%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
68.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+45%
47.1 % -45%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
252 fps Much better texture detail.
+47%
172 fps -47%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
125 fps Faster multi rendering.
+20%
104 fps -20%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
161 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+36%
118 fps -36%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+102%
86.8 fps -102%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
285 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+47%
194 fps -47%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
134 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+22%
110 fps -22%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
175 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+36%
129 fps -36%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
187 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+96%
95.2 fps -96%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
190 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+55%
122 fps -55%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
63.2 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+13%
56.2 fps -13%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
211 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+15%
183 fps -15%
Market Share
Based on 4,052,324 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.45 % -9% 0.49 % Slightly higher market share.
+9%
Value
Value For Money
77.3 % Slightly better value.
+9%
70.6 % -9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % +1% 90 % -1%
Price
Price (score)
$304 -34% $200 Much cheaper.
+34%
Age
Newest
24 Months 0% 24 Months 0%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+49%
144 fps -49%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
167 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+17%
143 fps -17%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
196 fps Much better lighting effects.
+48%
132 fps -48%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
156 fps Better reflection handling.
+21%
129 fps -21%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $297AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
Intel Core i5-7600K $233Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $268Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $169
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback