Real World Speed
Performance profile from 24,219 user samples
20,668 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 74% Asus(1043 04ED) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 59% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 59% Great: 74%
SPEED RANK: 21st / 541
3,551 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 44% Asus(1043 04F5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 44% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 541
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
68.9 % Much faster effective speed.
51.9 % -33%
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
255 fps Much better texture detail.
191 fps -34%
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
127 fps Faster multi rendering.
106 fps -20%
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
164 fps Faster NBody calculation.
138 fps -19%
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
90.6 fps -96%
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
284 fps Much better peak texture detail.
218 fps -30%
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
134 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
112 fps -20%
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
176 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
146 fps -21%
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
188 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
95.4 fps -97%
Market Share
Based on 3,725,364 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.63 % Hugely higher market share.
0.15 % -320%
Value For Money
78 % Slightly better value.
71.8 % -9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % Much more popular.
67 % -33%
Price (score)
$304 -26% $226 Cheaper.
23 Months -22% 18 Months More recent.
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
214 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
161 fps -33%
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
168 fps Better peak reflection handling.
142 fps -18%
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
197 fps Much better lighting effects.
149 fps -32%
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
157 fps Better reflection handling.
132 fps -19%

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300AMD RX 480 $210Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
Intel Core i5-7600K $240Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $167
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback