Real World Speed
Performance profile from 51,814 user samples
32,445 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 55% XFX(1682 9390)
Poor: 55% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 555
19,369 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3414)
Worst Bench: 47% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 47% Great: 63%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 555
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
65.6 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
56.1 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
253 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
219 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
126 fps 129 fps +2%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
163 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+9%
150 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
177 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+49%
119 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
286 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+10%
260 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
135 fps 139 fps +3%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
176 fps +1% 174 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+50%
126 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
187 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+35%
139 fps -35%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+12%
88.3 fps -12%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46.5 fps -1% 47 fps +1%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
71.9 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+48%
48.6 fps -48%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.5 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+23%
53.1 fps -23%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+33%
76.8 fps -33%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+28%
93 fps -28%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
53.5 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+10%
48.5 fps -10%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps -2% 96.6 fps +2%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
188 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+11%
170 fps -11%
Market Share
Based on 7,379,078 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.39 % Slightly higher market share.
+5%
0.37 %
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % 81.9 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
95 % 99 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$304 $208 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
32 Months 18 Months Much more recent.
+44%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
214 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+12%
191 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
166 fps 175 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+5%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
195 fps Better lighting effects.
+25%
156 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
155 fps 161 fps +4%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $975SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback