Real World Speed
Performance profile from 49,420 user samples
31,709 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 58% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 58% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 37th / 592
17,711 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 46% Gigabyte(1458 22E1) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 46% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
65.8 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
56.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
256 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
220 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
126 fps 128 fps +2%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
162 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+8%
150 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+48%
119 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
287 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+8%
265 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
132 fps 138 fps +5%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
170 fps 174 fps +2%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
186 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+46%
127 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
184 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+31%
140 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.8 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+13%
88.1 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
45.9 fps 48 fps +5%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70.1 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+43%
49.1 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.9 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+28%
51.5 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+32%
76.9 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+21%
94.7 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51.9 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+7%
48.6 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+7%
94.4 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
180 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+17%
153 fps
Market Share
Based on 9,195,838 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.37 % Much higher market share.
+48%
0.25 %
Value
Value For Money
74.5 % 82 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 99 % +1%
Price
Price (score)
$304 $208 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
36 Months 22 Months Much more recent.
+39%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
212 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
192 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
164 fps 174 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+6%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
197 fps Better lighting effects.
+25%
157 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
156 fps 161 fps +3%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $124
Intel Core i5-8600K $239AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $116
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $178SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $35HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback