Real World Speed
Performance profile from 68,919 user samples
6,679 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Asus(1043 04E9) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 58% XFX(1682 9395)
Poor: 58% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 542
62,240 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% MSI(1462 3283)
Worst Bench: 63% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.1 % +4% 71.2 % -4%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
278 fps Better texture detail.
+28%
217 fps -28%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
129 fps -17% 151 fps Faster multi rendering.
+17%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
181 fps -18% 213 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+18%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+10%
166 fps -10%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
318 fps Better peak texture detail.
+30%
245 fps -30%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
137 fps -22% 167 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+22%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
194 fps -19% 230 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+19%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
193 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
179 fps -8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
249 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+52%
164 fps -52%
Market Share
Based on 3,755,189 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.16 % -2,963% 4.9 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,963%
Value
Value For Money
70 % -39% 97.1 % Much better value.
+39%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
81 % -43% 116 % Much more popular.
+43%
Price
Price (score)
$400 -43% $230 Much cheaper.
+43%
Age
Newest
23 Months -57% 10 Months Much more recent.
+57%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
234 fps -9% 255 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+9%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps -27% 217 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+27%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
214 fps -7% 230 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
161 fps -24% 199 fps Better reflection handling.
+24%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. The 390X has a slightly increased GPU clock speed, a significantly increased memory speed and a higher minimum VRAM of 8GB but it shares the same core GPU hardware. Looking at the overclocked performance differences between the older 290X and the 390X shows that the two cards are approximately the same, which comes as no surprise considering that the 390X is actually just a factory overclocked 290X. Smart shoppers obviously won't be happy to pay AMD a premium of around $100 simply for overclocking a two year old 290X. That said the 390X does offer stellar performance, particularly at 4K resolutions and if prices drop significantly it could become a strong contender. We only have one MSI sample benchmark for the 390X so far so we will revisit this GPU when we have a better sample of all the available cards. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
Intel Core i5-7600K $240AMD RX 480 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $127
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $165
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback