Real World Speed
Performance profile from 96,254 user samples
11,814 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Asus(1043 04DF) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 55% AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 55% Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 593
84,440 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% EVGA(3842 5998) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 59% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Poor: 59% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 593
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
70.8 % 96.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
282 fps 318 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+13%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
131 fps 190 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+45%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
181 fps 281 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+55%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps 192 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+5%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps 380 fps Better peak texture detail.
+19%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps 213 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+54%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
195 fps 322 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+65%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
193 fps 226 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+17%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
175 fps 208 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+19%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
71 fps 83 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+18%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+28%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
208 fps 235 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+13%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps 98 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+32%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 84 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+53%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 133 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+40%
Market Share
Based on 10,282,750 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.13 % 0.84 % Hugely higher market share.
+546%
Value
Value For Money
55.5 % 73.8 % Much better value.
+33%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % 107 % More popular.
+20%
Price
Price (score)
$529 +4% $550
Age
Newest
38 Months +3% 39 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
234 fps 441 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+88%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
172 fps 319 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+85%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
212 fps 315 fps Much better lighting effects.
+49%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
162 fps 278 fps Much better reflection handling.
+72%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. The 390X has a slightly increased GPU clock speed, a significantly increased memory speed and a higher minimum VRAM of 8GB but it shares the same core GPU hardware. Looking at the overclocked performance differences between the older 290X and the 390X shows that the two cards are approximately the same, which comes as no surprise considering that the 390X is actually just a factory overclocked 290X. Smart shoppers obviously won't be happy to pay AMD a premium of around $100 simply for overclocking a two year old 290X. That said the 390X does offer stellar performance, particularly at 4K resolutions and if prices drop significantly it could become a strong contender. We only have one MSI sample benchmark for the 390X so far so we will revisit this GPU when we have a better sample of all the available cards. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $383Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback