Real World Speed
Performance profile from 70,011 user samples
8,368 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 63% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 63% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 20th / 548
61,643 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 74% MSI(1462 3230) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 74% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 12th / 548
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
70.9 % -40% 99.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
277 fps -18% 327 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
130 fps -48% 193 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+48%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
181 fps -60% 289 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+60%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps -9% 198 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+9%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
316 fps -21% 382 fps Better peak texture detail.
+21%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
137 fps -58% 217 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+58%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
193 fps -71% 330 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+71%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
192 fps -19% 228 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+19%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
239 fps -6% 254 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+6%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps -16% 120 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+16%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61.5 fps -44% 88.8 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+44%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67.7 fps -43% 97.1 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+43%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
246 fps -24% 305 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+24%
Market Share
Based on 5,892,084 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.11 % -773% 0.96 % Hugely higher market share.
+773%
Value
Value For Money
55.5 % -35% 74.9 % Much better value.
+35%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
85 % -22% 104 % More popular.
+22%
Price
Price (score)
$529 Slightly cheaper.
+6%
$560 -6%
Age
Newest
29 Months +3% 30 Months -3%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
233 fps -76% 410 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+76%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps -91% 326 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+91%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps -51% 325 fps Much better lighting effects.
+51%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
161 fps -78% 286 fps Much better reflection handling.
+78%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. The 390X has a slightly increased GPU clock speed, a significantly increased memory speed and a higher minimum VRAM of 8GB but it shares the same core GPU hardware. Looking at the overclocked performance differences between the older 290X and the 390X shows that the two cards are approximately the same, which comes as no surprise considering that the 390X is actually just a factory overclocked 290X. Smart shoppers obviously won't be happy to pay AMD a premium of around $100 simply for overclocking a two year old 290X. That said the 390X does offer stellar performance, particularly at 4K resolutions and if prices drop significantly it could become a strong contender. We only have one MSI sample benchmark for the 390X so far so we will revisit this GPU when we have a better sample of all the available cards. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $240AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $180Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $192SanDisk Extreme 64GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $52Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback