Real World Speed
Performance profile from 33,335 user samples
9,714 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 31% Asus(1043 04AC) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 26% PowerColor(148C 2374)
Poor: 26% Great: 31%
SPEED RANK: 75th / 546
23,621 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 40% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 40% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 546
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
28.5 % -55% 44.4 % Much faster effective speed.
+55%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
100 fps -72% 172 fps Much better texture detail.
+72%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.3 fps -63% 103 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+63%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
74 fps -59% 118 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+59%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.9 fps -8% 84.4 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+8%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
117 fps -67% 195 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+67%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.7 fps -69% 111 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+69%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
82.1 fps -57% 129 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+57%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
80.6 fps -13% 91.4 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+13%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
114 fps -23% 141 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+23%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
40.1 fps -13% 45.2 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+13%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps -34% 179 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+34%
Market Share
Based on 5,367,662 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.46 % +2% 0.45 % -2%
Value
Value For Money
66.1 % -4% 68.8 % +4%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
80 % -18% 94 % More popular.
+18%
Price
Price (score)
$104 Much cheaper.
+45%
$190 -45%
Age
Newest
14 Months Much more recent.
+50%
28 Months -50%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
89.1 fps -64% 146 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+64%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
84.5 fps -70% 144 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+70%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
78 fps -68% 131 fps Much better lighting effects.
+68%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
79.5 fps -62% 129 fps Much better reflection handling.
+62%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $298Nvidia GTX 1070 $395Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $785SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback