Real World Speed
Performance profile from 59,762 user samples
7,101 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 32% Asus(1043 04AC) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 24% Gigabyte(1458 22DE)
Poor: 24% Great: 32%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 542
52,661 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 144% Gigabyte(1458 3713) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 84% Asus(1043 85AA)
Poor: 84% Great: 144%
SPEED RANK: 3rd / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
28.6 % -340% 126 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+340%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
102 fps -299% 407 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+299%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.2 fps -277% 238 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+277%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
74.6 fps -431% 396 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+431%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
78 fps -214% 245 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+214%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
119 fps -293% 468 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+293%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.7 fps -294% 259 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+294%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
82.6 fps -442% 448 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+442%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
80.8 fps -233% 269 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+233%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
152 fps -97% 300 fps Hugely Better League of Legends fps.
+97%
Market Share
Based on 3,755,189 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.52 % -588% 3.58 % Hugely higher market share.
+588%
Value
Value For Money
73 % -43% 105 % Much better value.
+43%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % -49% 104 % Much more popular.
+49%
Price
Price (score)
$90 Hugely cheaper.
+81%
$485 -81%
Age
Newest
9 Months More recent.
+18%
11 Months -18%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
89.6 fps -438% 482 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+438%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
85 fps -393% 419 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+393%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
78.9 fps -420% 410 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+420%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
80 fps -366% 373 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+366%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1080 is Nvidia’s new flagship graphics card. It features the new 16 nm (down from 28 nm) Pascal architecture. This is the first die shrink since the release of the GTX 680 at which time the manufacturing process shrunk from 40 nm down to 28 nm. In terms of typical 3D gaming performance the 1080 is around 30% faster than the GTX 980 Ti and it manages to deliver the additional performance with a TDP of just 180 Watts which is 70 Watts less than the 980 Ti. The new Pascal architecture delivers a satisfying jump in performance over Maxwell and the GTX 1080 is now the fastest single GPU available. Over the coming months older generation cards will likely see significant price drops as the better value for money 1070, 1060 and 1050 cards slowly replace their predecessors. [May '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
Intel Core i5-7600K $240AMD RX 480 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $127
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $165
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback