COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
Nvidia
VS
Effective Speed 
+30%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 175,749 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
64,240 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 22% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 17% Gigabyte(1458 22D6)
Poor: 17% Great: 22%
SPEED RANK: 217th / 714
111,509 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 28% EVGA(3842 2957)
Worst Bench: 22% Zotac(19DA 1376)
Poor: 22% Great: 28%
SPEED RANK: 187th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		19.7 % 25.6 % Faster effective speed.
+30%
Average Score 
+28%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		23.6 fps 31.6 fps Much better lighting effects.
+34%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		27.6 fps 37.5 fps Much better reflection handling.
+36%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		27.1 fps 34.2 fps Faster multi rendering.
+26%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		27 fps 31.4 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+16%
Overclocked Score 
+34%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		26.8 fps 35.9 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+34%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		29 fps 45.8 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+58%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		28.2 fps 36.3 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+29%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		30.4 fps 34.6 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+14%
Game FPS 
+14%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		117 Fps 122 Fps +5%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		52 Fps +4% 50 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		39 Fps +2% 38 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		113 Fps 119 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+6%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		59 Fps 69 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		32 Fps 33 Fps +4%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		97 Fps 133 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+37%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		67 Fps 84 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+25%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		47 Fps 66 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+41%
Value & Sentiment 
+37%
Market Share
Based on 67,457,713 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.05 % 0.12 % Hugely higher market share.
+140%
Value
Value For Money 		51.9 % 60.6 % Better value.
+17%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		58 % 59 % +2%
Price
Price (score) 		$90 Cheaper.
+10% 		$100
Nice To Haves 
+1%
Age
Newest 		92 Months More recent.
+12% 		104 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		37.4 fps Better peak texture detail.
+14% 		32.7 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		26.4 fps 30.9 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+17%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		32.7 fps Better texture detail.
+10% 		29.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		22.8 fps 28.1 fps Faster complex splatting.
+23%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 19.7%
Average Bench 25.6%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 950 is Nvidia's latest Maxwell card which is based on a GTX 960 but with 25% fewer CUDA cores and 25% fewer texture units. Comparing the GTX 960 and 950 shows that, as expected, effective speed has been reduced by 25%. The GTX 950 is positioned above GTX 750 Ti which is Nvidia's energy efficient mass market GPU. Comparing the 750 Ti and 950 shows that 950 is nearly 50% faster but it's also priced 50% higher so the 950 doesn't offer improved value for money. Gaming performance for the GTX 950 at resolutions up to 1080p on high/ultra settings will be satisfactory most of the time. That said, the GTX 950 is priced on the high side ($160). At present the GTX 960 ($171) offers 25% better performance for just 7% more money. See a current list of the best value graphics cards here. [Aug '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
64,240
111,509
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback