Real World Speed
Performance profile from 55,578 user samples
19,576 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 47% Gigabyte(1458 22E1) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 47% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 592
36,002 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Gigabyte(1458 22B6) 2GB
Worst Bench: 41% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 41% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 57th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.3 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
44.6 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
220 fps Better texture detail.
+27%
173 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
129 fps Faster multi rendering.
+24%
104 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
151 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+28%
118 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
119 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+43%
83.2 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+36%
194 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+28%
109 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
175 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+40%
125 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
127 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+43%
88.8 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
140 fps +1% 139 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.1 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+21%
73 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+17%
41.1 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.1 fps 50.8 fps +3%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51.5 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+19%
43.5 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.9 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+20%
64.1 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.7 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+10%
86 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48.6 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+17%
41.6 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.4 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+32%
71.6 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
153 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+11%
138 fps
Market Share
Based on 9,281,153 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % 0.39 % Much higher market share.
+56%
Value
Value For Money
82.3 % Much better value.
+34%
61.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
92 %
Price
Price (score)
$208 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
$228
Age
Newest
22 Months Much more recent.
+39%
36 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+35%
142 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+27%
138 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
157 fps Better lighting effects.
+18%
133 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
161 fps Better reflection handling.
+24%
130 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $125
Intel Core i5-8600K $222AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback