Real World Speed
Performance profile from 138,237 user samples
15,151 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 48% PowerColor(148C 2373)
Poor: 48% Great: 63%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 546
123,086 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 6769) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 65% EVGA(3842 6163)
Poor: 65% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 546
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.7 % -27% 71.9 % Faster effective speed.
+27%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
221 fps +3% 214 fps -3%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
129 fps -15% 148 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
153 fps -36% 208 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+36%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
119 fps -37% 163 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+37%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
262 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+8%
243 fps -8%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps -18% 164 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+18%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
175 fps -30% 227 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+30%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps -40% 177 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
140 fps -16% 163 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+16%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.9 fps -16% 98.6 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+16%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
47.6 fps -32% 62.8 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+32%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.8 fps -40% 73.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+40%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
53 fps -41% 75 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+41%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73.5 fps -35% 99.1 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+35%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
89.8 fps -45% 131 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48.6 fps -17% 57.2 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+17%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.7 fps -11% 106 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+11%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
192 fps -16% 223 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+16%
Market Share
Based on 5,357,299 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.33 % -1,448% 5.11 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,448%
Value
Value For Money
82.8 % -9% 90.4 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
95 % -41% 134 % Much more popular.
+41%
Price
Price (score)
$208 Cheaper.
+20%
$260 -20%
Age
Newest
14 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
15 Months -7%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps -31% 251 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+31%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps -23% 215 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+23%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
158 fps -44% 227 fps Much better lighting effects.
+44%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
161 fps -22% 197 fps Better reflection handling.
+22%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $319Nvidia GTX 1070 $395Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $222Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $153
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $785SanDisk Extreme 32GB $18
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback