Real World Speed
Performance profile from 308,341 user samples
19,404 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% XFX(1682 9470)
Worst Bench: 46% Asus(1043 04B0)
Poor: 46% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 590
288,937 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 109% Asus(1043 85A0)
Worst Bench: 81% Nvidia(10DE 119D)
Poor: 81% Great: 109%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 590
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.8 % 98.5 % Much faster effective speed.
+73%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
222 fps 306 fps Much better texture detail.
+38%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
129 fps 198 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+53%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
153 fps 284 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+86%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
119 fps 224 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+88%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps 351 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+33%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps 216 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+55%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
179 fps 316 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+77%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
128 fps 245 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+91%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
140 fps 201 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+44%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.1 fps 116 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+31%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48 fps 78.8 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+64%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.1 fps 98.6 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+101%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51.5 fps 93.7 fps Hugely Better Fallout 4 fps.
+82%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.9 fps 128 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+66%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.7 fps 146 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+54%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48.6 fps 81.7 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+68%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.4 fps 122 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+30%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
153 fps 224 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+46%
Market Share
Based on 8,820,372 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.27 % 4.45 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,548%
Value
Value For Money
83 % 86.2 % +4%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
99 % 179 % Hugely more popular.
+81%
Price
Price (score)
$208 Much cheaper.
+54%
$447
Age
Newest
21 Months Slightly more recent.
+9%
23 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
193 fps 353 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+83%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps 314 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+79%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
159 fps 309 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+94%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
160 fps 287 fps Much better reflection handling.
+79%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $136
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback