Real World Speed
Performance profile from 214,556 user samples
17,689 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 63% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 48% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 48% Great: 63%
SPEED RANK: 37th / 549
196,867 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% EVGA(3842 6276)
Worst Bench: 74% Asus(1043 8599)
Poor: 74% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 12th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.8 % -74% 98.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+74%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
222 fps -39% 308 fps Much better texture detail.
+39%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
130 fps -52% 198 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+52%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
152 fps -88% 285 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+88%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
120 fps -87% 224 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+87%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
262 fps -36% 356 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+36%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps -60% 221 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+60%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
174 fps -83% 319 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+83%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
127 fps -95% 248 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+95%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
139 fps -46% 204 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+46%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.3 fps -37% 121 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+37%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
47.8 fps -66% 79.2 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+66%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
47.1 fps -108% 98.2 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+108%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51.4 fps -82% 93.5 fps Hugely Better Fallout 4 fps.
+82%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.8 fps -68% 129 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+68%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.7 fps -55% 142 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+55%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48.7 fps -67% 81.4 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+67%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.6 fps -29% 124 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+29%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
171 fps -36% 232 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+36%
Market Share
Based on 6,229,687 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.34 % -1,421% 5.17 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,421%
Value
Value For Money
83 % -10% 91.7 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % -79% 175 % Much more popular.
+79%
Price
Price (score)
$208 Much cheaper.
+49%
$410 -49%
Age
Newest
16 Months Slightly more recent.
+11%
18 Months -11%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
191 fps -86% 355 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+86%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
176 fps -80% 317 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+80%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
159 fps -95% 310 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+95%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
163 fps -76% 287 fps Much better reflection handling.
+76%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback