Real World Speed
Performance profile from 114,105 user samples
19,192 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 45% Asus(1043 04AE) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 45% Great: 63%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 566
94,913 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 178% Gigabyte(1458 3762) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 53% Asus(1043 85E4)
Poor: 53% Great: 178%
SPEED RANK: 3rd / 566
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
55.8 % 154 % Hugely faster effective speed.
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
219 fps 551 fps Hugely better texture detail.
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
128 fps 250 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
150 fps 497 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
118 fps 271 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
260 fps 658 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps 280 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
173 fps 575 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 306 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
140 fps 255 fps Hugely Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.8 fps 140 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48 fps 111 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.1 fps 135 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 1 fps.
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51.5 fps 168 fps Hugely Better Fallout 4 fps.
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.8 fps 155 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.7 fps 187 fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 fps.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48.5 fps 114 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.4 fps 124 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
165 fps 280 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
Market Share
Based on 7,783,279 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.29 % 2.98 % Hugely higher market share.
Value For Money
81.5 % 93.8 % Better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
100 % 133 % Much more popular.
Price (score)
$208 Much cheaper.
19 Months 12 Months Much more recent.
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps 591 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
173 fps 544 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
154 fps 489 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
160 fps 472 fps Hugely better reflection handling.

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]


Hyped as the "Ultimate GEforce", the 1080 Ti is NVIDIA's latest flagship 4K VR ready GPU. It supersedes last years GTX 1080, offering a 30% increase in performance for a 40% premium (founders edition 1080 Tis will be priced at $699, pushing down the price of the 1080 to $499). It also supersedes the prohibitively expensive Titan X Pascal, pushing it off poll position in performance rankings. The 1080 Ti is based on the Pascal architecture and features a slightly modified version of the same flagship GP102 silicon found in the Titan X Pascal. It has 11GB of the high bandwidth GDDR5X video memory (versus 12GB in the Titan X Pascal) and an impressive 11GB frame buffer. Like the Titan X Pascal, it features 12bn transistors and 3584 CUDA cores which can run at a boost clock speed of 1.582 GHz – 3% faster than the Titan X Pascal's 1.531 GHz. This increased speed is partially attributable to the 1080 Ti’s new dualFET power system which allows the chip to run at higher power and more efficiently than ever before. The release of the 1080 Ti comes ahead of the competition from AMD's Vega - rumored for release in Q2 2017. Vega is AMD's next generation graphics card (following on from Polaris 10) featuring their new HBM2 die which is alleged to have eight times the capacity of GDDR5 with half of the footprint. NVDIA's own next generation graphics cards (Volta) are in the pipeline for 2018. [Mar '17 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback