Real World Speed
Performance profile from 41,760 user samples
6,258 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 67% Gigabyte(1458 22D7)
Poor: 67% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 533
35,502 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 142% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 89% MSI(1462 3232)
Poor: 89% Great: 142%
SPEED RANK: 5th / 533
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
77.9 % -61% 126 % Much faster effective speed.
+61%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
222 fps -46% 324 fps Much better texture detail.
+46%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
130 fps -49% 194 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+49%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
154 fps -88% 290 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+88%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
120 fps -66% 199 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+66%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
262 fps -45% 380 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+45%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps -54% 216 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+54%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
176 fps -88% 330 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+88%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
130 fps -75% 227 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
139 fps -45% 200 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+45%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.5 fps -35% 123 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+35%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46.9 fps -87% 87.5 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+87%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.4 fps -72% 93.9 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+72%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.1 fps -71% 144 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+71%
Market Share
Based on 2,897,055 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.9 % -56% 1.4 % Much higher market share.
+56%
Value
Value For Money
133 % Much better value.
+43%
92.5 % -43%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
94 % +2% 92 % -2%
Price
Price (score)
$165 Much cheaper.
+72%
$580 -72%
Age
Newest
6 Months Much more recent.
+71%
21 Months -71%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
193 fps -137% 457 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+137%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
178 fps -82% 324 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+82%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
158 fps -105% 324 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+105%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
163 fps -74% 283 fps Much better reflection handling.
+74%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X $399Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
Intel Core i7-7700K $310AMD RX 480 $177Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $240Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $170
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 32GB $26
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $650SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback