Real World Speed
Performance profile from 91,884 user samples
57,787 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 52% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 52% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 29th / 546
34,097 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
Worst Bench: 34% MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
Poor: 34% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 43rd / 546
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
45.8 % -40%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
252 fps Much better texture detail.
+32%
191 fps -32%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
137 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+114%
63.9 fps -114%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
179 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+27%
141 fps -27%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+37%
91.5 fps -37%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
299 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+34%
223 fps -34%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+106%
71.5 fps -106%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
205 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+28%
160 fps -28%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+28%
104 fps -28%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+11%
144 fps -11%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.3 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+27%
72.7 fps -27%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.9 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+35%
39.2 fps -35%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+60%
47.9 fps -60%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.1 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+54%
42.9 fps -54%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.4 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+115%
43 fps -115%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
118 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+12%
105 fps -12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.8 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+39%
40.1 fps -39%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
202 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+41%
143 fps -41%
Market Share
Based on 5,357,168 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.29 % Hugely higher market share.
+82%
0.71 % -82%
Value
Value For Money
52.7 % -26% 66.4 % Better value.
+26%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
146 % Hugely more popular.
+87%
78 % -87%
Price
Price (score)
$491 -57% $210 Much cheaper.
+57%
Age
Newest
16 Months Much more recent.
+67%
48 Months -67%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
218 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+33%
164 fps -33%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
184 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+95%
94.3 fps -95%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
184 fps Much better lighting effects.
+30%
141 fps -30%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+105%
82.3 fps -105%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $319Nvidia GTX 1070 $395Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $222Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $153
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $785SanDisk Extreme 32GB $18
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback