Real World Speed
Performance profile from 116,362 user samples
77,291 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% MSI(1462 3413)
Worst Bench: 55% Gigabyte(1458 22E7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 55% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 566
39,071 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(174B 3001)
Worst Bench: 31% MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
Poor: 31% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 566
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
64.5 % Much faster effective speed.
45.2 %
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
256 fps Much better texture detail.
190 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
62.7 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
181 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
139 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps Much faster complex splatting.
90.2 fps
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
300 fps Much better peak texture detail.
223 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
71.5 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
203 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
161 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
103 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
140 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.3 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
69.2 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.5 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
39.2 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
48.3 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.1 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
43.2 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.3 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
52.5 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
105 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.4 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
38.8 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68.5 fps Hugely Better World of Warcraft fps.
37.1 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
63 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
193 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
127 fps
Market Share
Based on 7,783,550 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.98 % Hugely higher market share.
0.52 %
Value For Money
60.9 % 65.5 % Slightly better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
146 % Much more popular.
83 %
Price (score)
$400 $210 Much cheaper.
21 Months Much more recent.
53 Months
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
216 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
162 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
94.3 fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
184 fps Much better lighting effects.
139 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
170 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
81.8 fps

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback