Real World Speed
Performance profile from 56,622 user samples
46,368 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 49% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 49% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 543
10,254 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 56% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 543
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.4 % -6% 70.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
252 fps -7% 269 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+7%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+12%
123 fps -12%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
180 fps +4% 173 fps -4%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps -37% 173 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+37%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
295 fps -3% 305 fps +3%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+12%
132 fps -12%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
207 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+10%
188 fps -10%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
134 fps -40% 187 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+40%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.9 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+10%
90.6 fps -10%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57.9 fps +4% 55.7 fps -4%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+29%
58.7 fps -29%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.3 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+17%
80.3 fps -17%
Market Share
Based on 4,352,374 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.54 % Hugely higher market share.
+516%
0.25 % -516%
Value
Value For Money
61.7 % Slightly better value.
+15%
53.9 % -15%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
138 % Much more popular.
+79%
77 % -79%
Price
Price (score)
$410 Cheaper.
+25%
$549 -25%
Age
Newest
13 Months Much more recent.
+71%
45 Months -71%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
217 fps -3% 223 fps +3%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
184 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+11%
166 fps -11%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
183 fps -9% 200 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+9%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+10%
153 fps -10%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $410Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $128SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback