Real World Speed
Performance profile from 67,941 user samples
48,156 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% MSI(1462 3415)
Worst Bench: 52% PwrHis(1787 A480) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 52% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 23rd / 542
19,785 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 51% Asus(1043 04E3)
Worst Bench: 40% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 40% Great: 51%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.6 % Much faster effective speed.
47.2 % -41%
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
252 fps Much better texture detail.
173 fps -46%
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps Much faster multi rendering.
104 fps -33%
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
180 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
118 fps -53%
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps Much faster complex splatting.
86.4 fps -45%
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
298 fps Much better peak texture detail.
195 fps -53%
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
111 fps -33%
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
204 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
127 fps -61%
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
134 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
94.9 fps -41%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
164 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
141 fps -16%
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.9 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
75.8 fps -32%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.9 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
50.5 fps -32%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.3 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
68.7 fps -37%
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
84.7 fps -37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.2 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
42.8 fps -29%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
197 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
182 fps -8%
Market Share
Based on 4,087,262 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.71 % Hugely higher market share.
0.46 % -272%
Value For Money
47.5 % -49% 70.7 % Much better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
138 % Much more popular.
92 % -50%
Price (score)
$608 -67% $200 Much cheaper.
12 Months Much more recent.
24 Months -50%
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
216 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
144 fps -50%
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
184 fps Better peak reflection handling.
142 fps -30%
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
184 fps Much better lighting effects.
132 fps -39%
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps Much better reflection handling.
129 fps -31%

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]


The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $225AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $278Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback