Real World Speed
Performance profile from 230,395 user samples
69,001 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Asus(1043 04FB)
Worst Bench: 52% MSI(1462 3415)
Poor: 52% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 549
161,394 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 6267)
Worst Bench: 66% MSI(1462 3283)
Poor: 66% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.8 % -14% 72.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+14%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
251 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
217 fps -16%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps -8% 149 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+8%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
179 fps -17% 210 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+17%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps -33% 166 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+33%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
299 fps Better peak texture detail.
+23%
243 fps -23%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps -10% 163 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+10%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
204 fps -11% 227 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+11%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
134 fps -34% 180 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+34%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps -2% 163 fps +2%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.7 fps -8% 99 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+8%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.2 fps -16% 63 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+16%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.7 fps +2% 74.3 fps -2%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.6 fps -13% 74.1 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+13%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93.2 fps -7% 99.7 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+7%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60.8 fps -6% 64.4 fps Slightly Better Rise of the Tomb Raider fps.
+6%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps -7% 130 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56.9 fps -3% 58.7 fps +3%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67.7 fps -10% 74.6 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+10%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps -4% 107 fps +4%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
196 fps -3% 202 fps +3%
Market Share
Based on 6,245,296 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.22 % -360% 5.61 % Hugely higher market share.
+360%
Value
Value For Money
79.2 % -18% 93.5 % Better value.
+18%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
148 % +3% 144 % -3%
Price
Price (score)
$265 -6% $250 Slightly cheaper.
+6%
Age
Newest
18 Months -6% 17 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
214 fps -16% 249 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps -17% 215 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+17%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
182 fps -25% 227 fps Better lighting effects.
+25%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps -18% 199 fps Better reflection handling.
+18%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $106
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback