Real World Speed
Performance profile from 91,005 user samples
47,521 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% MSI(1462 3415)
Worst Bench: 55% XFX(1682 9480)
Poor: 55% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 542
43,484 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 36E7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 6th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.9 % -49% 99.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+49%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
253 fps -28% 325 fps Better texture detail.
+28%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps -40% 194 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+40%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
181 fps -61% 291 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+61%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps -59% 200 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+59%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
297 fps -27% 378 fps Better peak texture detail.
+27%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps -47% 218 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+47%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
202 fps -63% 330 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+63%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps -73% 230 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+73%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
165 fps -22% 200 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+22%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps -20% 123 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.5 fps -52% 83.1 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+52%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
78.4 fps -15% 90.4 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+15%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
64.2 fps -55% 99.4 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+55%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.7 fps -51% 140 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+51%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62.6 fps -22% 76.7 fps Better Rise of the Tomb Raider fps.
+22%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.7 fps -52% 84.7 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+52%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
232 fps -26% 292 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+26%
Market Share
Based on 4,051,858 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.73 % Higher market share.
+24%
1.39 % -24%
Value
Value For Money
47.8 % -57% 75.2 % Much better value.
+57%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
136 % Much more popular.
+39%
98 % -39%
Price
Price (score)
$608 -8% $560 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
Age
Newest
12 Months Much more recent.
+52%
25 Months -52%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
216 fps -77% 382 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+77%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
184 fps -78% 327 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+78%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
185 fps -72% 319 fps Much better lighting effects.
+72%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
170 fps -68% 285 fps Much better reflection handling.
+68%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $297AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
Intel Core i5-7600K $233Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $268Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $169
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback