Real World Speed
Performance profile from 179,270 user samples
89,559 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 47% Sapphire(174B E354) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 47% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 595
89,711 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 58% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 595
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.6 % 97.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+53%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
255 fps 323 fps Better texture detail.
+27%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps 192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+38%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
178 fps 284 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+60%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps 195 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+56%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
301 fps 382 fps Better peak texture detail.
+27%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
149 fps 217 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+46%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
204 fps 328 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+61%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps 228 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+71%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps 208 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+31%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 83 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+51%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94 fps 122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+30%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps 235 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+29%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55 fps 74 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+34%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76 fps 98 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+29%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
86 fps 127 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+47%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54 fps 84 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+55%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps 154 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+23%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 101 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+50%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps 116 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+13%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 133 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+43%
Market Share
Based on 10,955,673 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.85 % 0.85 %
Value
Value For Money
76.1 % +2% 74.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
151 % Much more popular.
+35%
112 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 Much cheaper.
+49%
$550
Age
Newest
27 Months Much more recent.
+32%
40 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps 378 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+76%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
184 fps 323 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+76%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
177 fps 314 fps Much better lighting effects.
+77%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps 281 fps Much better reflection handling.
+64%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $115
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $145SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback