Real World Speed
Performance profile from 140,884 user samples
75,736 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% MSI(1462 3413)
Worst Bench: 49% Asus(1043 0505) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 49% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 571
65,148 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 66% Asus(1043 8549) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 66% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 571
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.6 % 97.7 % Much faster effective speed.
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
252 fps 321 fps Better texture detail.
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
137 fps 192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
178 fps 286 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
124 fps 196 fps Much faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
297 fps 383 fps Better peak texture detail.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps 215 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
203 fps 328 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps 227 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps 249 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.3 fps 122 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
53 fps 81.9 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50.8 fps 75.1 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) fps.
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.8 fps 98.3 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.1 fps 98.6 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.3 fps 135 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps 154 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.4 fps 86 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68.8 fps 95.4 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps 119 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
194 fps 249 fps Better League of Legends fps.
Market Share
Based on 7,873,059 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.84 % 0.84 %
Value For Money
60 % 74.5 % Better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
146 % Much more popular.
107 %
Price (score)
$400 Cheaper.
21 Months Much more recent.
34 Months
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
216 fps 373 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps 322 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
182 fps 315 fps Much better lighting effects.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
168 fps 281 fps Much better reflection handling.

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]


The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
Intel Core i5-8600K $243AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $216SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback