Real World Speed
Performance profile from 65,174 user samples
3,923 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 35% Device(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 28% Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 28% Great: 35%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 549
61,251 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
31.7 % -210% 98.2 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+210%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
120 fps -170% 324 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+170%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
64 fps -200% 192 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+200%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
86.5 fps -233% 288 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+233%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
78.7 fps -152% 198 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+152%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
140 fps -173% 382 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+173%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
67.3 fps -224% 218 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+224%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
96.1 fps -240% 327 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+240%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
82.7 fps -177% 229 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+177%
Market Share
Based on 6,165,253 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.26 % -296% 1.03 % Hugely higher market share.
+296%
Value
Value For Money
75.4 % +1% 75 % -1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
74 % -42% 105 % Much more popular.
+42%
Price
Price (score)
$100 Hugely cheaper.
+82%
$550 -82%
Age
Newest
6 Months Hugely more recent.
+81%
31 Months -81%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
102 fps -275% 383 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+275%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
86.9 fps -273% 324 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+273%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
88.2 fps -258% 316 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+258%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
80.1 fps -253% 283 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+253%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback