Real World Speed
Performance profile from 159,111 user samples
1,658 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Asus(1043 0517)
Worst Bench: 64% MSI(1462 3419) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 64% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 542
157,453 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% EVGA(3842 2974)
Worst Bench: 50% MSI(1462 3160)
Poor: 50% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
72.4 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+14%
63.3 % -14%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
276 fps Much better texture detail.
+42%
195 fps -42%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
144 fps -4% 150 fps +4%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
200 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+9%
184 fps -9%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps +5% 125 fps -5%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
310 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+38%
224 fps -38%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
152 fps -11% 168 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+11%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
218 fps +5% 208 fps -5%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
138 fps -2% 141 fps +2%
Market Share
Based on 3,772,485 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.91 % -337% 3.98 % Hugely higher market share.
+337%
Value
Value For Money
93.4 % Better value.
+22%
76.7 % -22%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
85 % -19% 101 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score)
$250 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
$275 -9%
Age
Newest
1 Months Hugely more recent.
+97%
32 Months -97%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
226 fps -1% 228 fps +1%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps -3% 196 fps +3%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
202 fps +2% 198 fps -2%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
177 fps +2% 174 fps -2%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $99
Intel Core i5-7600K $229AMD RX 480 $227Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $148
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback