Real World Speed
Performance profile from 90,537 user samples
19,479 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% MSI(1462 3418)
Worst Bench: 59% MSI(1462 3417)
Poor: 59% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 555
71,058 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 54% EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 54% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 12th / 555
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
69 % 97.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+41%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
276 fps 320 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
142 fps 191 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+35%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
198 fps 285 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+44%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
130 fps 197 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+52%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
316 fps 380 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
153 fps 215 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+41%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
215 fps 328 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+53%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
138 fps 227 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+64%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
182 fps -38% 250 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+38%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.9 fps -23% 122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+23%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57.2 fps -42% 81.4 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+42%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70.5 fps -37% 96.6 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+37%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.9 fps -41% 93 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+41%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
130 fps -18% 154 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61.9 fps -37% 84.8 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+37%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
80.2 fps -20% 96.2 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+20%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps -36% 119 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+36%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
169 fps -49% 253 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+49%
Market Share
Based on 7,378,738 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.68 % 0.9 % Much higher market share.
+32%
Value
Value For Money
94.2 % Better value.
+27%
74.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
101 % 107 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$230 Much cheaper.
+58%
$550
Age
Newest
10 Months Much more recent.
+70%
33 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
228 fps 375 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+64%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
191 fps 323 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+69%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
200 fps 313 fps Much better lighting effects.
+56%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
176 fps 280 fps Much better reflection handling.
+59%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $975SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback