CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
236 EFps 282 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+19%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
78 EFps 128 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+64%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
98 EFps 170 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+73%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
94 EFps 151 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+61%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
117 EFps 169 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+44%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 408,477 user samples
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 714
316,424 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 134% Sapphire(174B A500) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 109% Gigabyte(1458 37A5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78 % 124 % Much faster effective speed.
+58%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.3 fps 165 fps Much better lighting effects.
+68%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
105 fps 171 fps Much better reflection handling.
+63%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
88.6 fps 181 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+104%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
114 fps 146 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+28%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
109 fps 185 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+70%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
112 fps 229 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+104%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
94.1 fps 193 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+105%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
128 fps 158 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+23%
Market Share
Based on 67,419,379 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % 0.64 % Hugely higher market share.
+967%
Value
Value For Money
109 % Much better value.
+51%
72 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % 63 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$170 Much cheaper.
+58%
$407
Age
Newest
80 Months 66 Months More recent.
+18%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
175 fps 191 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+9%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.6 fps 133 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+71%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
155 fps 166 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+7%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
74.5 fps 123 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+65%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's RTX 2080 is based on its new Turing architecture which boasts new AI and ray tracing technology that could eventually result in better GPU performance. Unfortunately there are currently no games which can take advantage of these new capabilities. The early 2080 benchmarks only exhibit a modest (20%) performance improvement over the 1080 which considering the new price tag of $800 for the Founders Edition is hard to stomach. The 2080 features 2944 CUDA cores, a base/boost speed of 1515/1710 MHz, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. NVIDIA have also released the 2080 Ti which has marginally higher specs together with a jaw dropping price tag of $1200 for the Founders Edition. The RTX 2080 features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Unfortunately for gamers and other consumers, AMD’s top end GPUs such as the Vega 64 still lag NVIDIA's previous flagship 1080 Ti by 30% so there is very little pressure on NVIDIA to offer better value for money. The 2080 only has 8GB of RAM which is fine today but will likely haunt any early adopters that plan to keep the card for more than two years. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback