Real World Speed
Performance profile from 209,701 user samples
174,816 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 43% Asus(1043 85D1)
Worst Bench: 34% Gigabyte(1458 372A)
Poor: 34% Great: 43%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 592
34,885 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Asus(1043 04DD)
Worst Bench: 56% MSI(1462 2015)
Poor: 56% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
38.7 % 66.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+71%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
120 fps 258 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+115%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
79.4 fps 128 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+61%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
115 fps 164 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+43%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
81.3 fps 177 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+118%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
136 fps 288 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+112%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
85 fps 134 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+58%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps 174 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+35%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
88.3 fps 187 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+112%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
42.6 fps 57.4 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+35%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps 181 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
44.2 fps 47.2 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+7%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73.9 fps 99.5 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+35%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
44.7 fps 70.2 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+57%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
38.9 fps 52.5 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+35%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
140 fps 184 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+31%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57.7 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+18%
49.1 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
44.1 fps 65.9 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+50%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
107 fps 115 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+8%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.9 fps 99 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+80%
Market Share
Based on 9,764,155 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.33 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,039%
0.38 %
Value
Value For Money
68.6 % 74.8 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 100 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$155 Much cheaper.
+49%
$304
Age
Newest
20 Months Much more recent.
+46%
37 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
142 fps 213 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+50%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
86.4 fps 165 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+91%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
120 fps 195 fps Much better lighting effects.
+62%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
79.8 fps 157 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+97%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparing userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations but we only have one benchmark for the 1050 Ti so the average score will probably improve as we gather more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. [Oct '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $945SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback