Real World Speed
Performance profile from 133,522 user samples
113,527 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Worst Bench: 58% Asus(1043 85B1)
Poor: 58% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 592
19,995 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Sapphire(174B E349)
Worst Bench: 45% XFX(1682 9470)
Poor: 45% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.5 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
56.4 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
192 fps 222 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+13%
130 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
194 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+27%
153 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
153 fps Faster complex splatting.
+28%
120 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
217 fps 263 fps Better peak texture detail.
+21%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
157 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+13%
139 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
211 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+21%
175 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
169 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
127 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
156 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+11%
140 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60.7 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+27%
48 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.5 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+5%
87.7 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.5 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+14%
48.6 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.7 fps +2% 48.7 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
168 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+17%
144 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.6 fps +0% 91.5 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.6 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+21%
48.6 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.9 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+30%
51.5 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+24%
96.3 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82.2 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+6%
77.3 fps
Market Share
Based on 9,755,038 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.91 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,064%
0.25 %
Value
Value For Money
92.1 % Slightly better value.
+12%
82.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
93 % 100 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$225 $208 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
Age
Newest
23 Months 23 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
224 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+17%
192 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+10%
173 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
203 fps Much better lighting effects.
+31%
155 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
162 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $945SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback