Real World Speed
Performance profile from 106,131 user samples
96,267 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3716)
Worst Bench: 63% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 544
9,864 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 31% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 26% Asus(1043 04AC) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 26% Great: 31%
SPEED RANK: 72nd / 544
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
71.9 % Hugely faster effective speed.
28.7 % -150%
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
214 fps Hugely better texture detail.
102 fps -110%
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
63.1 fps -135%
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
209 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
74.5 fps -181%
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
77.9 fps -109%
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
242 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
119 fps -103%
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
169 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
65.7 fps -157%
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
227 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
82.2 fps -176%
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
80.5 fps -121%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
163 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
114 fps -42%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62.8 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
40.1 fps -56%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
223 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
133 fps -67%
Market Share
Based on 4,630,619 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.87 % Hugely higher market share.
0.56 % -770%
Value For Money
87.1 % Much better value.
66.6 % -31%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
128 % Much more popular.
76 % -68%
Price (score)
$275 -62% $104 Much cheaper.
13 Months -8% 12 Months Slightly more recent.
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
253 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
89.1 fps -184%
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
215 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
84.6 fps -154%
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
226 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
78.9 fps -186%
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
197 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
79.7 fps -147%

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]


The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $307Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $99
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $291AMD RX 480 $390Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $130
Intel Core i5-7600K $217Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $155
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback