Real World Speed
Performance profile from 85,948 user samples
73,295 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3716)
Worst Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 3739) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 61% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 542
12,653 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 44% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 44% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
70.5 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
57.3 % -23%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
215 fps 0% 215 fps 0%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
149 fps Faster multi rendering.
+16%
129 fps -16%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
210 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+41%
149 fps -41%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
164 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+38%
119 fps -38%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
244 fps -7% 260 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+7%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
168 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+21%
139 fps -21%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
230 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
176 fps -31%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+39%
128 fps -39%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
162 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+16%
139 fps -16%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+20%
84.8 fps -20%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.2 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+40%
47.2 fps -40%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74.3 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+29%
57.8 fps -29%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+37%
54 fps -37%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+37%
71.4 fps -37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56.2 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+13%
49.8 fps -13%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
227 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+16%
196 fps -16%
Market Share
Based on 4,080,305 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.76 % Hugely higher market share.
+852%
0.5 % -852%
Value
Value For Money
93.8 % Slightly better value.
+12%
83.6 % -12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
119 % Much more popular.
+34%
89 % -34%
Price
Price (score)
$239 -13% $208 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
Age
Newest
11 Months -9% 10 Months Slightly more recent.
+9%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
255 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+32%
193 fps -32%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
217 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+23%
177 fps -23%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
228 fps Much better lighting effects.
+49%
153 fps -49%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
198 fps Better reflection handling.
+23%
161 fps -23%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $307Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $278AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
Intel Core i5-7600K $225Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback