Real World Speed
Performance profile from 146,940 user samples
97,580 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Asus(1043 85AC)
Worst Bench: 64% EVGA(3842 6267) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 64% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 544
49,360 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Asus(1043 04FB)
Worst Bench: 48% Asus(1043 04FB)
Poor: 48% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 544
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
72.7 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+13%
64 % -13%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
217 fps -16% 252 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
150 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
138 fps -9%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
211 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+17%
180 fps -17%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
165 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+32%
125 fps -32%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
246 fps -20% 296 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
169 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+14%
148 fps -14%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
230 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+13%
204 fps -13%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+34%
133 fps -34%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
163 fps +1% 160 fps -1%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.6 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+7%
92.3 fps -7%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62.8 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+19%
52.9 fps -19%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73.8 fps -4% 76.8 fps +4%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+13%
66.1 fps -13%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.1 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+7%
92.4 fps -7%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61.9 fps +4% 59.5 fps -4%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
131 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+11%
118 fps -11%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57.2 fps +2% 55.8 fps -2%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
77.2 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+13%
68 fps -13%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
106 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+5%
101 fps -5%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
223 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+10%
202 fps -10%
Market Share
Based on 4,675,196 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.83 % Hugely higher market share.
+218%
1.52 % -218%
Value
Value For Money
87 % Much better value.
+42%
61.5 % -42%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
128 % -10% 141 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$280 Cheaper.
+28%
$390 -28%
Age
Newest
13 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
14 Months -7%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
253 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
218 fps -16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
216 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+18%
183 fps -18%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
228 fps Better lighting effects.
+25%
183 fps -25%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
199 fps Better reflection handling.
+18%
168 fps -18%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $367Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $390Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $212Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $165
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $57HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $139SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback