Real World Speed
Performance profile from 364,091 user samples
161,394 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 6267)
Worst Bench: 66% MSI(1462 3283)
Poor: 66% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 549
202,697 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Gigabyte(1458 367A)
Worst Bench: 50% Zotac(19DA 2370) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 50% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
72.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+14%
63.8 % -14%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
217 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+11%
196 fps -11%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
149 fps +1% 148 fps -1%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
210 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+15%
183 fps -15%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
166 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+33%
125 fps -33%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
243 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+8%
224 fps -8%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
163 fps -1% 165 fps +1%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
227 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+11%
204 fps -11%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
180 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+29%
140 fps -29%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
163 fps +4% 157 fps -4%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps +5% 94.5 fps -5%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
63 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+19%
53 fps -19%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74.3 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+12%
66.3 fps -12%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74.1 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+24%
59.9 fps -24%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.7 fps +4% 96.1 fps -4%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
64.4 fps Better Rise of the Tomb Raider fps.
+29%
49.9 fps -29%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
130 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+5%
124 fps -5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.7 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+20%
48.9 fps -20%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
74.6 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+15%
65.1 fps -15%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
107 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+7%
100 fps -7%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
202 fps +4% 194 fps -4%
Market Share
Based on 6,245,296 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
5.61 % Much higher market share.
+45%
3.86 % -45%
Value
Value For Money
93.5 % Better value.
+17%
80.2 % -17%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
144 % Much more popular.
+31%
110 % -31%
Price
Price (score)
$250 +4% $260 -4%
Age
Newest
17 Months Much more recent.
+56%
39 Months -56%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
249 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+8%
230 fps -8%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
215 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
197 fps -9%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
227 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+14%
199 fps -14%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
199 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+13%
176 fps -13%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $106
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback