Real World Speed
Performance profile from 531,708 user samples
274,402 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 6267)
Worst Bench: 65% EVGA(3842 6267)
Poor: 65% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 590
257,306 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% MSI(1462 3160)
Worst Bench: 51% Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 590
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
71.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+13%
63.5 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
213 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+10%
194 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps 149 fps +1%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
208 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+14%
182 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+30%
125 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+7%
224 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
165 fps +1% 163 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
226 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+10%
206 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
141 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
162 fps +3% 157 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.7 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+5%
95 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61.3 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+16%
52.9 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+10%
61.2 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73.5 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+11%
66.1 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72.8 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+20%
60.8 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
100 fps +5% 95.7 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+9%
125 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.3 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+19%
49 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
77.8 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+21%
64.1 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
108 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+20%
89.5 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
193 fps +4% 186 fps
Market Share
Based on 8,830,705 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
5.81 % Much higher market share.
+67%
3.48 %
Value
Value For Money
85.8 % Much better value.
+36%
63.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
159 % Much more popular.
+39%
114 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 Cheaper.
+24%
$370
Age
Newest
22 Months Much more recent.
+50%
44 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
249 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
227 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
213 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
196 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
225 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+14%
197 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
196 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+13%
174 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback