Real World Speed
Performance profile from 379,862 user samples
300,029 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 60% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 592
79,833 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 53% Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 53% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 592
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
71 % 96.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
211 fps 319 fps Much better texture detail.
+51%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 190 fps Faster multi rendering.
+29%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
207 fps 282 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+36%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
161 fps 191 fps Faster complex splatting.
+19%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
241 fps 375 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+56%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
162 fps 212 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+31%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
227 fps 322 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+42%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
179 fps 226 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67.4 fps 74.2 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+10%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
161 fps 249 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+54%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61 fps 83.7 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+37%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
100 fps 122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+22%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73.5 fps 97.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+33%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.1 fps 84.6 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+46%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
190 fps 239 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+26%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps 130 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+26%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.8 fps 100 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+31%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72.6 fps 96 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+32%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
136 fps 154 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+13%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
100 fps 133 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+33%
Market Share
Based on 9,755,038 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
6.01 % Hugely higher market share.
+591%
0.87 %
Value
Value For Money
83.2 % Slightly better value.
+13%
73.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
159 % Much more popular.
+49%
107 %
Price
Price (score)
$289 Much cheaper.
+47%
$550
Age
Newest
24 Months Much more recent.
+37%
38 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
249 fps 437 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+76%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
214 fps 319 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+49%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
221 fps 316 fps Much better lighting effects.
+43%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
194 fps 278 fps Much better reflection handling.
+43%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $945SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback