Real World Speed
Performance profile from 340,786 user samples
274,402 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 6267)
Worst Bench: 65% EVGA(3842 6267)
Poor: 65% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 590
66,384 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 114% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 69% Nvidia(10DE 17C8) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 114%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 590
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
71.6 % 97.5 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
213 fps 322 fps Much better texture detail.
+51%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps 192 fps Faster multi rendering.
+30%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
208 fps 285 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+37%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps 197 fps Faster complex splatting.
+21%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 384 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+60%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
165 fps 219 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+33%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
226 fps 328 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+45%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps 227 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+28%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
162 fps 249 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+54%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.7 fps 122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+22%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
61.3 fps 83.2 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+36%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
67 fps 80.7 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+20%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73.5 fps 97.3 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+32%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72.8 fps 98.6 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
+35%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
100 fps 134 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+34%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps 154 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+13%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.3 fps 85.2 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+46%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
77.8 fps 90 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+16%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
108 fps 116 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+7%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
193 fps 243 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+26%
Market Share
Based on 8,830,705 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
5.81 % Hugely higher market share.
+592%
0.84 %
Value
Value For Money
85.8 % Better value.
+15%
74.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
159 % Much more popular.
+51%
105 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 Much cheaper.
+49%
$550
Age
Newest
22 Months Much more recent.
+39%
36 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
249 fps 375 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+51%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
213 fps 327 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+54%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
225 fps 313 fps Much better lighting effects.
+39%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
196 fps 282 fps Much better reflection handling.
+44%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback