Real World Speed
Performance profile from 62,267 user samples
40,333 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 371A)
Worst Bench: 85% Gigabyte(1458 371A)
Poor: 85% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 533
21,934 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% XFX(1682 9480)
Worst Bench: 75% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 75% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 533
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
91.6 % +4% 88.4 % -4%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
215 fps -20% 258 fps Better texture detail.
+20%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
149 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
140 fps -6%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
213 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+16%
184 fps -16%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
164 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
127 fps -29%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
245 fps -23% 301 fps Better peak texture detail.
+23%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
161 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
148 fps -9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
232 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+13%
206 fps -13%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
178 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+34%
133 fps -34%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps +2% 178 fps -2%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps -1% 102 fps +1%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.1 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+17%
56.3 fps -17%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73.4 fps -10% 81 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+10%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.8 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+19%
63.7 fps -19%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96 fps +3% 92.8 fps -3%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
69.7 fps Slightly Better Rise of the Tomb Raider fps.
+12%
62.2 fps -12%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
129 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+17%
110 fps -17%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
59.1 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+8%
54.9 fps -8%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
83.5 fps -14% 95.1 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+14%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
111 fps -2% 114 fps +2%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
234 fps -7% 251 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+7%
Market Share
Based on 2,891,971 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.6 % Much higher market share.
+44%
3.2 % -44%
Value
Value For Money
123 % -17% 144 % Better value.
+17%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
111 % -3% 114 % +3%
Price
Price (score)
$235 -25% $177 Cheaper.
+25%
Age
Newest
7 Months Slightly more recent.
+12%
8 Months -12%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
252 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+16%
217 fps -16%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
216 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+17%
184 fps -17%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
228 fps Better lighting effects.
+21%
188 fps -21%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
198 fps Better reflection handling.
+15%
172 fps -15%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X $399Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
Intel Core i7-7700K $310AMD RX 480 $177Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Pentium G4560 $99Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $164
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 32GB $26
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $650SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback