Real World Speed
Performance profile from 83,064 user samples
13,160 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 131% Asus(1043 861E)
Worst Bench: 101% Gigabyte(1458 3794) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 101% Great: 131%
SPEED RANK: 9th / 586
69,904 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 65% HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 586
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
117 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
97.9 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
380 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
322 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
203 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
192 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
366 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+28%
286 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
238 fps Faster complex splatting.
+21%
197 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
433 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+14%
381 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
224 fps +3% 217 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
412 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+25%
329 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
265 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+16%
229 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
230 fps 250 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+9%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps +0% 122 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.2 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+11%
82 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72.1 fps 81.1 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+13%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96.4 fps 98.7 fps +2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.3 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+12%
85.4 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87.9 fps 90 fps +2%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
112 fps 118 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+5%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
195 fps 245 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+26%
Market Share
Based on 8,348,673 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.1 % Higher market share.
+24%
0.89 %
Value
Value For Money
95.2 % Better value.
+27%
74.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
71 % 105 % Much more popular.
+48%
Price
Price (score)
$500 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
$550
Age
Newest
5 Months Hugely more recent.
+86%
35 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
424 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+12%
379 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
395 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+22%
325 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
376 fps Better lighting effects.
+19%
317 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
352 fps Better reflection handling.
+25%
281 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is NVIDIA’s latest HD and VR ready, gaming GPU and is successor to the current number one GPU by market share, the GTX 1070. Like the 1070, the 1070 Ti is based on the16nm Pascal architecture and GP104 GPU. Both feature 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256 bit memory interface producing a total memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s, and both have a rated boost clock speed of 1.683 GHz, although both are geared to be over clocked. In fact, the 1070 Ti is basically the 1070 but with 25% more working CUDA cores (2432 versus 1920) and slightly higher base clock of 1607MHz (versus 1506MHz in the 1070). This translates to the 1070 Ti being as nearly as powerful as the GTX 1080 which has 2560 CUDA cores, 8 GB of GDRR5X memory and boost clock of 1733 GHz. With founder’s editions available at $449, compared to $470 for AMD’s recent Vega based RX 56 and $510 for the GTX 1080, the 1070 Ti represents good value for money. The rumoured fast approaching release of Volta (NVIDIA’s next generation architecture following on from Pascal) in early 2018 may upset demand for the 1070 Ti. [Nov '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $315Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback