Real World Speed
Performance profile from 265,745 user samples
192,874 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 140% Dell(1028 3366) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 91% MSI(1462 3362)
Poor: 91% Great: 140%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 584
72,871 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% MSI(1462 3232)
Worst Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3252) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 79% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 584
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
126 % Faster effective speed.
+28%
98.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
405 fps Better texture detail.
+25%
323 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
235 fps Faster multi rendering.
+22%
193 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
391 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+36%
287 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
245 fps Faster complex splatting.
+24%
197 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
464 fps Better peak texture detail.
+22%
380 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
258 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
216 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
437 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+33%
329 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
269 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+18%
228 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
240 fps 250 fps +4%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+9%
122 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.6 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+17%
82 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85.6 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) fps.
+6%
81.1 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+17%
98.7 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+6%
98.6 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
145 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+8%
134 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
168 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+10%
153 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93.1 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+9%
85.4 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+10%
90 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+7%
118 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
235 fps 245 fps +4%
Market Share
Based on 8,301,867 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.61 % Hugely higher market share.
+407%
0.91 %
Value
Value For Money
95.9 % Better value.
+28%
75 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
131 % More popular.
+26%
104 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 +0% $550
Age
Newest
22 Months Much more recent.
+37%
35 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
463 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+22%
378 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
414 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+29%
321 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
398 fps Better lighting effects.
+25%
318 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
369 fps Much better reflection handling.
+31%
282 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1080 is Nvidia’s new flagship graphics card. It features the new 16 nm (down from 28 nm) Pascal architecture. This is the first die shrink since the release of the GTX 680 at which time the manufacturing process shrunk from 40 nm down to 28 nm. In terms of typical 3D gaming performance the 1080 is around 30% faster than the GTX 980 Ti and it manages to deliver the additional performance with a TDP of just 180 Watts which is 70 Watts less than the 980 Ti. The new Pascal architecture delivers a satisfying jump in performance over Maxwell and the GTX 1080 is now the fastest single GPU available. Over the coming months older generation cards will likely see significant price drops as the better value for money 1070, 1060 and 1050 cards slowly replace their predecessors. [May '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $310Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback