Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,296,484 user samples
1,082,454 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Zotac(19DA 0426)
Worst Bench: 93% EVGA(3842 6183)
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 714
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
102 % Faster effective speed.
+30%
79 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
129 fps Much better lighting effects.
+31%
98.6 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
146 fps Better reflection handling.
+27%
115 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
114 fps Faster multi rendering.
+18%
97 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
135 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
97.7 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+29%
111 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
203 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+54%
132 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
122 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+16%
105 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
147 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+37%
107 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
198 Fps +1% 196 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
140 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+16%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
96 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+18%
81 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+18%
80 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps 215 Fps +0%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+8%
115 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
111 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+14%
98 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+15%
82 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
239 Fps 244 Fps +2%
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
163 Fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+7%
153 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
96 Fps Slightly Better WoW Fps.
+5%
91 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+10%
121 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,463,110 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.71 % Hugely higher market share.
+613%
0.24 %
Value
Value For Money
60.7 % Hugely better value.
+81%
33.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
66 %
Price
Price (score)
$400 Cheaper.
+29%
$560
Age
Newest
94 Months More recent.
+12%
107 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
146 fps Better peak texture detail.
+29%
113 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+29%
97.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
130 fps Much better texture detail.
+30%
100 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
117 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+33%
87.9 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1080 is Nvidia’s new flagship graphics card. It features the new 16 nm (down from 28 nm) Pascal architecture. This is the first die shrink since the release of the GTX 680 at which time the manufacturing process shrunk from 40 nm down to 28 nm. In terms of typical 3D gaming performance the 1080 is around 30% faster than the GTX 980 Ti and it manages to deliver the additional performance with a TDP of just 180 Watts which is 70 Watts less than the 980 Ti. The new Pascal architecture delivers a satisfying jump in performance over Maxwell and the GTX 1080 is now the fastest single GPU available. Over the coming months older generation cards will likely see significant price drops as the better value for money 1070, 1060 and 1050 cards slowly replace their predecessors. [May '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback