Real World Speed
Performance profile from 121,116 user samples
74,876 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 144% Asus(1043 85AA)
Worst Bench: 97% Nvidia(10DE 119E)
Poor: 97% Great: 144%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 543
46,240 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Gigabyte(1458 36DD) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 56% EVGA(3842 4992)
Poor: 56% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 7th / 543
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
127 % Faster effective speed.
+28%
98.8 % -28%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
411 fps Better texture detail.
+28%
322 fps -28%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
237 fps Faster multi rendering.
+23%
193 fps -23%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
397 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+38%
288 fps -38%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
246 fps Faster complex splatting.
+24%
198 fps -24%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
470 fps Better peak texture detail.
+22%
384 fps -22%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
260 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
219 fps -19%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
444 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+35%
329 fps -35%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
270 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+17%
231 fps -17%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
245 fps -4% 255 fps +4%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
135 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+11%
122 fps -11%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
89.1 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+6%
84.1 fps -6%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
111 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+18%
94.8 fps -18%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
89 fps -6% 94 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+6%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
148 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+14%
130 fps -14%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Much Better Rise of the Tomb Raider fps.
+34%
77.3 fps -34%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
169 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+10%
154 fps -10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.8 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+12%
83.3 fps -12%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.9 fps -8% 108 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+8%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
114 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+5%
108 fps -5%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
275 fps +4% 265 fps -4%
Market Share
Based on 4,370,270 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.93 % Hugely higher market share.
+195%
1.33 % -195%
Value
Value For Money
96.6 % Better value.
+30%
74.5 % -30%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
109 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
103 % -6%
Price
Price (score)
$550 +2% $560 -2%
Age
Newest
13 Months Much more recent.
+50%
26 Months -50%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
484 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+27%
382 fps -27%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
418 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+28%
326 fps -28%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
412 fps Much better lighting effects.
+30%
316 fps -30%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
374 fps Much better reflection handling.
+33%
282 fps -33%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1080 is Nvidia’s new flagship graphics card. It features the new 16 nm (down from 28 nm) Pascal architecture. This is the first die shrink since the release of the GTX 680 at which time the manufacturing process shrunk from 40 nm down to 28 nm. In terms of typical 3D gaming performance the 1080 is around 30% faster than the GTX 980 Ti and it manages to deliver the additional performance with a TDP of just 180 Watts which is 70 Watts less than the 980 Ti. The new Pascal architecture delivers a satisfying jump in performance over Maxwell and the GTX 1080 is now the fastest single GPU available. Over the coming months older generation cards will likely see significant price drops as the better value for money 1070, 1060 and 1050 cards slowly replace their predecessors. [May '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1070 $45Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback