Real World Speed
Performance profile from 124,847 user samples
94,959 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 25% EVGA(3842 3757)
Worst Bench: 19% Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
Poor: 19% Great: 25%
SPEED RANK: 103rd / 571
29,888 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 39% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 39% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 571
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
22.6 % 44.4 % Hugely faster effective speed.
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
66.2 fps 172 fps Hugely better texture detail.
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
53.5 fps 104 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
70.4 fps 118 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
40.1 fps 83.3 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
74.8 fps 195 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
59.7 fps 109 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
79.7 fps 126 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
44.8 fps 89.8 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
113 fps 138 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50.7 fps 73 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
36.2 fps 43.1 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
37 fps 50.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
32.9 fps 45.7 fps Much Better Fallout 4 fps.
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48.7 fps 64 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.9 fps 85.5 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
23.6 fps 41.6 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
47.4 fps 71.6 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
113 fps 143 fps Better League of Legends fps.
Market Share
Based on 7,873,059 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.56 % Hugely higher market share.
0.36 %
Value For Money
50.5 % 60.9 % Better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
81 % 94 % More popular.
Price (score)
$110 Much cheaper.
49 Months 33 Months Much more recent.
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
77.8 fps 142 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
51 fps 139 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
67.8 fps 131 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
45.4 fps 128 fps Hugely better reflection handling.

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
Intel Core i5-8600K $243AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $216SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback