Real World Speed
Performance profile from 60,490 user samples
36,145 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 42% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
Poor: 42% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 546
24,345 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% XFX(1682 9380)
Worst Bench: 38% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 38% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 546
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
48 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
44.4 % -8%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
167 fps -3% 172 fps +3%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
113 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+10%
103 fps -10%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
148 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+25%
118 fps -25%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
85 fps +1% 84.2 fps -1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
185 fps -6% 196 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+6%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
121 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
111 fps -9%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
162 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+27%
128 fps -27%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
91.9 fps +1% 91.4 fps -1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
151 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+7%
141 fps -7%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.1 fps +1% 75.5 fps -1%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
45.2 fps -0% 45.2 fps +0%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
42.4 fps -21% 51.2 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+21%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
58.4 fps -9% 63.6 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+9%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.1 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+20%
82.1 fps -20%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
178 fps -1% 179 fps +1%
Market Share
Based on 5,392,832 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.81 % Much higher market share.
+76%
0.46 % -76%
Value
Value For Money
57.6 % -20% 68.8 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % -29% 94 % More popular.
+29%
Price
Price (score)
$279 -32% $190 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
53 Months -47% 28 Months Much more recent.
+47%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps -1% 145 fps +1%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
111 fps -30% 144 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+30%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
131 fps 0% 131 fps 0%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
102 fps -26% 129 fps Better reflection handling.
+26%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $96
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $158SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback