Real World Speed
Performance profile from 67,496 user samples
39,456 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
Worst Bench: 43% Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 43% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 549
28,040 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 47% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 41% Sapphire(174B E308)
Poor: 41% Great: 47%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
48.1 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
44.6 % -8%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
168 fps -3% 173 fps +3%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
113 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
104 fps -9%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
148 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+25%
118 fps -25%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
85.1 fps +1% 84 fps -1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
187 fps -4% 194 fps +4%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
121 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+12%
108 fps -12%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
161 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+30%
124 fps -30%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
92.1 fps +2% 90.3 fps -2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
151 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+8%
140 fps -8%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.8 fps +3% 74.4 fps -3%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
41.3 fps -5% 43.3 fps +5%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
41.4 fps -22% 50.7 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+22%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57.5 fps -11% 64 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+11%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+15%
90.5 fps -15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
40.1 fps -6% 42.6 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+6%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
179 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+16%
155 fps -16%
Market Share
Based on 6,180,862 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.84 % Hugely higher market share.
+83%
0.46 % -83%
Value
Value For Money
57.7 % -6% 61.1 % Slightly better value.
+6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
74 % -26% 93 % More popular.
+26%
Price
Price (score)
$279 -18% $228 Cheaper.
+18%
Age
Newest
55 Months -45% 30 Months Much more recent.
+45%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
144 fps +1% 142 fps -1%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
111 fps -23% 137 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+23%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
132 fps 0% 132 fps 0%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
102 fps -26% 129 fps Better reflection handling.
+26%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD R9 380 succeeds the Tonga based R9 285. The only difference between the two cards is a tiny 2% GPU clock increase on the R9 380 but for the most part, the R9 380 is identical to the R9 285. We only have one sample of the R9 380 so far and comparing benchmarks between the R9 380 and R9 285 shows that the two cards are indeed very close. Unlike with several of the other AMD R9 300 series re-badges, the MSRP has actually dropped on the R9 380 to $199. This card could be a strong value contender if prices drop much below $200. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $313Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback