Real World Speed
Performance profile from 90,925 user samples
66,387 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% EVGA(3842 4991) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 61% Asus(1043 8549) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 61% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 550
24,538 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Sapphire(174B E285)
Worst Bench: 52% Sapphire(174B E283)
Poor: 52% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 550
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+57%
62.1 % -57%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
321 fps Much better texture detail.
+32%
244 fps -32%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
191 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+62%
118 fps -62%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
285 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+86%
153 fps -86%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
196 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%
167 fps -17%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+37%
278 fps -37%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
214 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+66%
129 fps -66%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
326 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+95%
167 fps -95%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
227 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
183 fps -24%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
252 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+65%
152 fps -65%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+37%
87.8 fps -37%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82.9 fps Hugely Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+100%
41.5 fps -100%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97.5 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+62%
60.3 fps -62%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95.6 fps Hugely Better Fallout 4 fps.
+116%
44.2 fps -116%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Hugely Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+89%
72.6 fps -89%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.7 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+97%
43 fps -97%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+14%
104 fps -14%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
277 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+69%
164 fps -69%
Market Share
Based on 6,884,295 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.89 % Hugely higher market share.
+197%
0.3 % -197%
Value
Value For Money
74.6 % Better value.
+27%
58.7 % -27%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % Much more popular.
+31%
81 % -31%
Price
Price (score)
$550 -27% $399 Cheaper.
+27%
Age
Newest
32 Months Much more recent.
+37%
51 Months -37%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
373 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+80%
207 fps -80%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
321 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+98%
162 fps -98%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
318 fps Much better lighting effects.
+72%
185 fps -72%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
282 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+92%
147 fps -92%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2018 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $224AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $52Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $220SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback