Real World Speed
Performance profile from 52,743 user samples
42,489 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Gigabyte(1458 36DD) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 55% EVGA(3842 4992)
Poor: 55% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 543
10,254 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 56% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 543
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
98.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+39%
70.5 % -39%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
321 fps Better texture detail.
+19%
269 fps -19%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+56%
123 fps -56%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
286 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+65%
173 fps -65%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+14%
173 fps -14%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
382 fps Better peak texture detail.
+25%
305 fps -25%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
219 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+66%
132 fps -66%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
329 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+75%
188 fps -75%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
231 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
187 fps -24%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+35%
90.6 fps -35%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.1 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+51%
55.7 fps -51%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+62%
58.7 fps -62%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
130 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+62%
80.3 fps -62%
Market Share
Based on 4,352,374 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.35 % Hugely higher market share.
+440%
0.25 % -440%
Value
Value For Money
74.1 % Much better value.
+38%
53.9 % -38%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
103 % Much more popular.
+34%
77 % -34%
Price
Price (score)
$560 -2% $549 +2%
Age
Newest
26 Months Much more recent.
+42%
45 Months -42%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
378 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+70%
223 fps -70%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
324 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+95%
166 fps -95%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
314 fps Much better lighting effects.
+57%
200 fps -57%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+84%
153 fps -84%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268AMD RX 480 $410Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
Intel Core i5-7600K $235Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $128SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback