Real World Speed
Performance profile from 54,063 user samples
48,283 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 74% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 74% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 546
5,780 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 53% Sapphire(174B E308)
Worst Bench: 45% XFX(1682 9385)
Poor: 45% Great: 53%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 546
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
98.6 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+99%
49.5 % -99%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
325 fps Much better texture detail.
+68%
194 fps -68%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+80%
107 fps -80%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
288 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+107%
139 fps -107%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+125%
87.4 fps -125%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+75%
218 fps -75%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
215 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+92%
112 fps -92%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
328 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+126%
145 fps -126%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
228 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+144%
93.4 fps -144%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
254 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+74%
146 fps -74%
Market Share
Based on 5,365,381 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.07 % Hugely higher market share.
+970%
0.1 % -970%
Value
Value For Money
74.4 % Slightly better value.
+9%
68.5 % -9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
108 % Much more popular.
+54%
70 % -54%
Price
Price (score)
$560 -60% $226 Much cheaper.
+60%
Age
Newest
29 Months -24% 22 Months More recent.
+24%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
381 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+137%
161 fps -137%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
322 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+125%
143 fps -125%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
320 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+115%
149 fps -115%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
284 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+114%
133 fps -114%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $395Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $222Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $145
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $785SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback