Real World Speed
Performance profile from 80,748 user samples
69,904 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 65% HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 586
10,844 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 60% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 60% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 586
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
97.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+38%
70.8 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
322 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
277 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+47%
131 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
286 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+57%
182 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
197 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+8%
183 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps Better peak texture detail.
+19%
319 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
217 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+57%
138 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
329 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+70%
193 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
229 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+19%
192 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
250 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+34%
186 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+25%
97.1 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+23%
67 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98.7 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+35%
73.2 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Much Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+36%
99.1 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85.4 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+46%
58.5 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
245 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+12%
219 fps
Market Share
Based on 8,352,357 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.9 % Hugely higher market share.
+462%
0.16 %
Value
Value For Money
74.8 % Much better value.
+35%
55.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
105 % More popular.
+18%
89 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 $529 +4%
Age
Newest
35 Months 34 Months +3%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
379 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+62%
234 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
325 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+90%
171 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
317 fps Much better lighting effects.
+50%
211 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
281 fps Much better reflection handling.
+76%
160 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. The 390X has a slightly increased GPU clock speed, a significantly increased memory speed and a higher minimum VRAM of 8GB but it shares the same core GPU hardware. Looking at the overclocked performance differences between the older 290X and the 390X shows that the two cards are approximately the same, which comes as no surprise considering that the 390X is actually just a factory overclocked 290X. Smart shoppers obviously won't be happy to pay AMD a premium of around $100 simply for overclocking a two year old 290X. That said the 390X does offer stellar performance, particularly at 4K resolutions and if prices drop significantly it could become a strong contender. We only have one MSI sample benchmark for the 390X so far so we will revisit this GPU when we have a better sample of all the available cards. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $158
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback