Real World Speed
Performance profile from 37,802 user samples
35,858 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 122% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 6th / 540
1,944 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 68% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 68% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 540
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
102 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
84.9 % -20%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
330 fps -8% 357 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+8%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
196 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+62%
121 fps -62%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
294 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+14%
259 fps -14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
202 fps Faster complex splatting.
+18%
171 fps -18%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
389 fps -2% 397 fps +2%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
222 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+72%
129 fps -72%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
335 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+20%
280 fps -20%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
233 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+28%
182 fps -28%
Market Share
Based on 3,502,469 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.3 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,200%
0.1 % -1,200%
Value
Value For Money
76.6 % Better value.
+29%
59.2 % -29%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
99 % More popular.
+19%
83 % -19%
Price
Price (score)
$560 Slightly cheaper.
+11%
$630 -11%
Age
Newest
23 Months -4% 22 Months +4%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
447 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+75%
255 fps -75%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
331 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+107%
160 fps -107%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
327 fps Much better lighting effects.
+40%
234 fps -40%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
288 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+95%
148 fps -95%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's new high end GPU (Hawaii powers the 290/X and 390/X series cards). The new GPU is coupled with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) which is a new memory architecture that allows for significantly higher bandwidth than previous generations. The Fury X is factory overclocked and has a TDP of just 275W, 4GB of VRAM and it comes fitted with a water cooling system which results in a relatively small form factor for a top end graphics card. Although the Fury X only has 4GB of VRAM, this is rarely a problem for gaming even at 4K resolutions. The key comparable for the Fury X is Nvidia's similarly priced 980 Ti. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $229AMD RX 480 $238Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
Intel Pentium G4560 $60Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $219Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $170
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $114SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback