Real World Speed
Performance profile from 51,878 user samples
49,044 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 115% Gigabyte(1458 36B6)
Worst Bench: 71% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 115%
SPEED RANK: 11th / 547
2,834 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 69% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 69% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 547
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
98.2 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
81.5 % -20%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
323 fps -9% 352 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+9%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+60%
120 fps -60%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
287 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+13%
254 fps -13%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
198 fps Faster complex splatting.
+17%
169 fps -17%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
382 fps -4% 396 fps +4%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
219 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+72%
127 fps -72%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
330 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+20%
274 fps -20%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
230 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+28%
180 fps -28%
Market Share
Based on 5,418,674 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.36 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,620%
0.05 % -2,620%
Value
Value For Money
74.1 % Slightly better value.
+15%
64.5 % -15%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % More popular.
+19%
90 % -19%
Price
Price (score)
$560 -7% $522 Slightly cheaper.
+7%
Age
Newest
29 Months -3% 28 Months +3%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
384 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+51%
255 fps -51%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
326 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+108%
157 fps -108%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
318 fps Much better lighting effects.
+38%
231 fps -38%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
283 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+93%
147 fps -93%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's new high end GPU (Hawaii powers the 290/X and 390/X series cards). The new GPU is coupled with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) which is a new memory architecture that allows for significantly higher bandwidth than previous generations. The Fury X is factory overclocked and has a TDP of just 275W, 4GB of VRAM and it comes fitted with a water cooling system which results in a relatively small form factor for a top end graphics card. Although the Fury X only has 4GB of VRAM, this is rarely a problem for gaming even at 4K resolutions. The key comparable for the Fury X is Nvidia's similarly priced 980 Ti. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback