Real World Speed
Performance profile from 48,655 user samples
45,468 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Gigabyte(1458 36CF) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 80% Asus(1043 8549) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 80% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 5th / 542
3,187 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Sapphire(174B E331)
Worst Bench: 43% Sapphire(174B E331)
Poor: 43% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 11th / 542
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
100 % Faster effective speed.
+24%
80.4 % -24%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
327 fps +1% 325 fps -1%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
195 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+67%
117 fps -67%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
293 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+30%
225 fps -30%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
200 fps Faster complex splatting.
+21%
165 fps -21%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
381 fps +1% 376 fps -1%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
217 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+67%
130 fps -67%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
330 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+31%
252 fps -31%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
230 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
183 fps -26%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
255 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+21%
210 fps -21%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+16%
105 fps -16%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.8 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+11%
85.6 fps -11%
Market Share
Based on 4,087,262 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.34 % Hugely higher market share.
+931%
0.13 % -931%
Value
Value For Money
75.4 % Slightly better value.
+15%
65.8 % -15%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
100 % Much more popular.
+35%
74 % -35%
Price
Price (score)
$560 -12% $495 Slightly cheaper.
+12%
Age
Newest
25 Months -8% 23 Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
376 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+42%
265 fps -42%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
327 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+103%
161 fps -103%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
319 fps Much better lighting effects.
+39%
230 fps -39%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
286 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+99%
144 fps -99%
ADVERTISEMENT

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $225AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $278Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback